Skip to content

Barycentric Evaluation in Poly Ops #1070

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gali/simd_barycentric
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gali-StarkWare
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor Author

Gali-StarkWare commented Apr 29, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@Gali-StarkWare Gali-StarkWare force-pushed the gali/barycentric_in_polyops branch from 9c44f04 to 5a792e4 Compare May 14, 2025 08:03
@Gali-StarkWare Gali-StarkWare changed the base branch from graphite-base/1070 to gali/simd_barycentric May 14, 2025 08:03
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.

Benchmark suite Current: 5a792e4 Previous: 8b5436d Ratio
iffts/simd ifft/21 7503293 ns/iter (± 86540) 3703714 ns/iter (± 128636) 2.03
iffts/simd ifft/27 599266702 ns/iter (± 6266301) 277030291 ns/iter (± 5776193) 2.16
iffts/simd ifft/28 1295217101 ns/iter (± 28006483) 586165718 ns/iter (± 12065155) 2.21

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

CC: @shaharsamocha7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants