-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.9k
Add FW loiter size and orientation control #24625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ryanjAA
wants to merge
5
commits into
PX4:main
Choose a base branch
from
ryanjAA:patch-15
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+26
−8
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b82bcd
Add loiter size and orientation
ryanjAA 8a02797
Fixed formatting
ryanjAA d58e3b9
Update src/modules/navigator/navigator_main.cpp
ryanjAA 3f4fbe4
Update src/modules/navigator/navigator_main.cpp
ryanjAA ac4faa2
Merge branch 'main' into patch-15
sfuhrer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really need this separate handling? In the
only_alt_change_requested
case we, as the name says, want to keep everything beside the altitude as it was set before, no?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this so when a 'change-altitude-only' command is sent (i.e. param3 and param4 omitted), we explicitly apply the vehicle’s default loiter radius and direction, exactly the behavior people expect today. Without this, the vehicle would continue using the previous radius/direction settings, which can be surprising.
Also, this makes the behavior match the MAVLink spec’s intent that omitted parameters revert to defaults.
That said, I don't actually care but I do think it's the right thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ryanjAA I still challenge that it's expected that if you send a "change altitude" through QGC the loiter direction changes (see screen-recording).
Could QGC send a full GoTo setpoint again? Probably, but it's currently not doing it, thus this change changes the current behavior.
Screencast.from.30-04-25.17.48.25.webm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But then the lat/long fields should also not being assumed but reset to e.g. the current vehicle position. Currently there it keeps the lat/long from the previous setpoint.