Skip to content

fix: /v2/stackerdb metrics identifier typo #6296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jiloc
Copy link
Contributor

@Jiloc Jiloc commented Jul 17, 2025

Description

I initially had this fix in #6201 but decided to move it a separate PR just in case.

Applicable issues

  • fixes #

Additional info (benefits, drawbacks, caveats)

Checklist

  • Test coverage for new or modified code paths
  • Changelog is updated
  • Required documentation changes (e.g., docs/rpc/openapi.yaml and rpc-endpoints.md for v2 endpoints, event-dispatcher.md for new events)
  • New clarity functions have corresponding PR in clarity-benchmarking repo
  • New integration test(s) added to bitcoin-tests.yml

@Jiloc Jiloc added this to the 3.1.0.0.14 milestone Jul 17, 2025
@Jiloc Jiloc self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025
@Jiloc Jiloc requested review from a team as code owners July 17, 2025 09:38
@Jiloc Jiloc moved this to Status: In Review in Stacks Core Eng Jul 17, 2025
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ impl HttpRequest for RPCListStackerDBReplicasRequestHandler {
}

fn metrics_identifier(&self) -> &str {
"/v2/stackedb/:principal/:contract_name/replicas"
"/v2/stackerdb/:principal/:contract_name/replicas"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a breaking change of some sort that I should record in the Changelog?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A good question. It probably should be recorded in the Changelog, but am not sure if it is used anywhere that it would break anything internally. Externally...very possible.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed - externally, it may break some metrics visualizations but i wouldn't think it would affect anything internally

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Status: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants