Backend data separation test #10531
Open
Backend data separation test #10531
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add backend data separation test with demo ExecutorBackend. Note: ExecutorBackend is a wrapper around a portable PTE file. It doesn't support delegated program-data separation in the sense of tagging tensors as external and placing them into the named data store as such. Rather, this test: 1. Creates a linear PTE file with data removed, using the portable flow. 2. Packages (1) into preprocessed blob as a delegate, using ExecutorBackend. Note: this discards the PTD portion. 3. Re-create the PTD portion via export_program (portable flow again). 4. Runs the delegated ExecutorBackend linear with portable linear.ptd file. Caveat: this means that LinearModule definition in export_program and export_delegated_program must stay in sync, as we get the PTE artifact from export_delegated_program (wrapped in ExecutorBackend), and the PTD artifact from export_program. Differential Revision: [D73679733](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73679733/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
requested review from
larryliu0820,
kirklandsign,
JacobSzwejbka,
swolchok and
tarun292
as code owners
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10531
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 8 New Failures, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit bb9fa67 with merge base df75088 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This was referenced Apr 28, 2025
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73679733 |
This PR needs a
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Add backend data separation test with demo ExecutorBackend.
Note: ExecutorBackend is a wrapper around a portable PTE file. It doesn't support delegated program-data separation in the sense of tagging tensors as external and placing them into the named data store as such. Rather, this test:
Caveat: this means that LinearModule definition in export_program and export_delegated_program must stay in sync, as we get the PTE artifact from export_delegated_program (wrapped in ExecutorBackend), and the PTD artifact from export_program.
Differential Revision: D73679733