Skip to content

collaborater #25022

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 214 commits into
base: pr/24814
Choose a base branch
from
Open

collaborater #25022

wants to merge 214 commits into from

Conversation

Kirubhakar-1998
Copy link

@Kirubhakar-1998 Kirubhakar-1998 commented May 3, 2025


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Errors

 ⚠️ OCA signatory status must be verified
 ⚠️ The pull request body must not be empty.

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #24814 must be integrated first

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25022/head:pull/25022
$ git checkout pull/25022

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25022
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25022/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25022

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25022

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25022.diff

Hamlin Li and others added 30 commits April 22, 2025 08:32
8346786: RISC-V: Reconsider ConditionalMoveLimit when adding conditional move

Reviewed-by: fyang, fjiang
Reviewed-by: naoto, jlu
Reviewed-by: kizune, serb
…te AES key

Reviewed-by: fferrari, valeriep, djelinski
Reviewed-by: liach, shade, vlivanov
Reviewed-by: kizune, honkar
Reviewed-by: kizune, honkar
…shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'

Reviewed-by: adinn
Reviewed-by: azvegint, dnguyen, tr
…er to set the breakpoint used for communication

Reviewed-by: lmesnik, amenkov
…rrect encoding

Reviewed-by: aboldtch, sviswanathan
…dful and macos run

Reviewed-by: abhiscxk, serb
…n debug logging is enabled

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, kevinw
Reviewed-by: pchilanomate, coleenp
@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label May 3, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 3, 2025

Hi @Kirubhakar-1998, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user Kirubhakar-1998" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2025

⚠️ @Kirubhakar-1998 a branch with the same name as the source branch for this pull request (master) is present in the target repository. If you eventually integrate this pull request then the branch master in your personal fork will diverge once you sync your personal fork with the upstream repository.

To avoid this situation, create a new branch for your changes and reset the master branch. You can do this by running the following commands in a local repository for your personal fork. Note: you do not have to name the new branch NEW-BRANCH-NAME.

$ git checkout -b NEW-BRANCH-NAME
$ git branch -f master 50358d1ca49c26d100c5c658de29c75f864fdc60
$ git push -f origin master

Then proceed to create a new pull request with NEW-BRANCH-NAME as the source branch and close this one.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2025

@Kirubhakar-1998 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • i18n
  • javadoc
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added graal graal-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org kulla kulla-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org security security-dev@openjdk.org jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org nio nio-dev@openjdk.org build build-dev@openjdk.org client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org net net-dev@openjdk.org labels May 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org graal graal-dev@openjdk.org hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org jmx jmx-dev@openjdk.org kulla kulla-dev@openjdk.org net net-dev@openjdk.org nio nio-dev@openjdk.org oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status security security-dev@openjdk.org serviceability serviceability-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.