Raise profiler ClassLoad events for array method tables #120796
Merged
+2
−8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR modifies the ClassLoader to raise profiler ClassLoad events for array method tables. Previously, array method tables were explicitly excluded from profiler notifications.
Key Changes:
- Removes exclusion of array method tables from profiler ClassLoad events
- Simplifies the conditional logic by removing the array check
- Updates the comment to reflect that only generics with unbound variables are excluded
github-actions
bot
added
the
needs-area-label
jakobbotsch
commented
Oct 16, 2025
This was referenced Oct 16, 2025
jkotas
added
area-Diagnostics-coreclr
and removed
needs-area-label
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @steveisok, @dotnet/dotnet-diag |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See discussion around #120411 (comment).