Skip to content

Fix eslint config #429

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Fix eslint config #429

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

timostamm
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Timo Stamm <ts@timostamm.de>
@timostamm timostamm force-pushed the tstamm/Fix-eslint-config branch from 9bfe452 to bbdda28 Compare September 30, 2024 12:40
@@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ describe("useSuspenseInfiniteQuery", () => {
expect(result.current.isFetching).toBeFalsy();
});

// eslint-disable-next-line vitest/expect-expect -- We are asserting via @ts-expect-error
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pnpm run all still passes when I remove @ts-expect-error 🙈

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out #428 has type errors then went unnoticed because of this issue.

CI should definitely catch type errors in tests. WDYT, @paul-sachs

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, i'll take a look and see what needs to be fixed here.

@timostamm timostamm merged commit b036366 into main Sep 30, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@timostamm timostamm deleted the tstamm/Fix-eslint-config branch September 30, 2024 13:07
@paul-sachs paul-sachs mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants