Skip to content

Add new registration-service config param for ui canary deployement #1174

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

alexeykazakov
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@mfrancisc mfrancisc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot !

Let's decide which one we want to merge . With or without the CRDs upgrade.

I'm fine with merging this one and opening a new one for CRD upgrade :)

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 6, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexeykazakov, mfrancisc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alexeykazakov,mfrancisc]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@alexeykazakov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's decide which one we want to merge . With or without the CRDs upgrade.
I'm fine with merging this one and opening a new one for CRD upgrade :)

That's the interesting part. I didn't do anything special. I just pulled your API PR locally and then did "make generate" and this is what I got for the host operator. A clean PR with no CRD changes besides your new configuration field.

So let's merge this clean PR first and then try to find out why you get other unrelated to your API changes in your PR. So it doesn't block us from advancing with the RHDH work.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 6, 2025

@mfrancisc
Copy link
Contributor

That's the interesting part. I didn't do anything special. I just pulled your API PR locally and then did "make generate" and this is what I got for the host operator.

I think things got mixed with the upgrade in between.
My guess is that on my local I had controller-gen already updated, while you ran it with the previous version which didn't cause the update of the CRDs.

@mfrancisc
Copy link
Contributor

I've merged the other one, we can close this. Thank you!

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.56%. Comparing base (c137181) to head (a2b6d56).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1174      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.53%   83.56%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          82       82              
  Lines        7927     7927              
==========================================
+ Hits         6622     6624       +2     
+ Misses       1104     1102       -2     
  Partials      201      201              

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants