-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
Towards nominals #70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Towards nominals #70
Conversation
Merge checklist:
|
Do you depend on solving the universe issue, or can that be done in a separate PR? |
The universe issue is not a problem here. We don't plan on removing |
@MarkusKL Feel free to add a reference to the nominal paper in the readme, either in this PR or in the PR integrating nominal. |
@cmester0 will this require any modifications for the hax backend? Could you check that all our examples still compile? |
LGTM |
I will add a reference to the paper in a week or two when it has been finalized for CSF and is online. Thanks for all of the comments, reviews and fixes. |
… automation and examples
…ade jasmin files less chatty
I have rebased this branch on current main in my own repository: MarkusKL#7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes required by Hax are removing trimmed and Parable proofs, or some renaming/updating to use fmaps. There should be nothing blocking from Hax, I will just fix everything once this is merged.
PR tracks progress towards nominal SSProve integration.