Skip to content

add Wurth Elektronik maintainers to MAINTAINERS.yml #91693

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mah-eiSmart
Copy link
Contributor

add Wurth Elektronik maintainers to MAINTAINERS.yml

@mah-eiSmart mah-eiSmart marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2025 12:58
@mah-eiSmart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wm-eisos FYI

@mah-eiSmart
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @kartben , this is the PR following our discussion at #91509.

- mah-eiSmart
- wm-eisos
files:
- boards/we/
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also add dts/arm/we/

MAINTAINERS.yml Outdated
labels:
- "platform: WE"
description: >-
dts files of Wurth Elektronik radio modules and development boards.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
dts files of Wurth Elektronik radio modules and development boards.
Wurth Elektronik radio modules, development boards, and SoCs.

…boards

maintainers.yml: add section for Wurth Elektronik sensor drivers and boards

Signed-off-by: Matthias Hauser <Matthias.Hauser@we-online.de>
@mah-eiSmart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kartben , thank you for the input. I changed the requested points. How can I overcome the failing "Maintainer file check" ?

Copy link

@mah-eiSmart
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kartben , thank you for the input. I changed the requested points. How can I overcome the failing "Maintainer file check" ?

@kartben, seems that some kind of approval is needed to continue here. In our discussion (#91509) I understood, that this is not needed. Can you please help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants