Misc. support for nrf9280pdk_cpuapp_iron #90756
Conversation
- This adds support of next generation secure firmware to application core for nrf9280pdk. Signed-off-by: Aymen Laouini <aymen.laouini@nordicsemi.no>
- use early init hook instead of nrf92_init. - add config flag for iron variant. Signed-off-by: Aymen Laouini <aymen.laouini@nordicsemi.no>
CPUCONF service now supports application on nrf9280pdk. Signed-off-by: Aymen Laouini <aymen.laouini@nordicsemi.no>
… vector table. - During debug the vector table could be empty, in that case an adequate message is returned. Signed-off-by: Aymen Laouini <aymen.laouini@nordicsemi.no>
|
Hello @ayla-nordicsemi, and thank you very much for your first pull request to the Zephyr project! |
github-actions
bot
requested review from
anangl,
jaz1-nordic,
kl-cruz,
magp-nordic,
masz-nordic and
nika-nordic
|
| @@ -19,3 +19,13 @@ config ASSERT | |||
| default n if ZTEST | |||
|
|
|||
| endif # BOARD_NRF9280PDK_NRF9280_CPUPPR | |||
|
|
|||
| if BOARD_NRF9280PDK_NRF9280_CPUAPP_IRON | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
soc commit needs to come before board commit which uses said soc commit
|
|
||
| / { | ||
| reserved-memory { | ||
| cpuapp_cpusys_ipc_shm: memory@2f88f600 { |
| /* This cpurad section is to be removed soon as there is no need for it anymore. | ||
| * Removing it now causes to much issues to resolve, keeping it is simpler | ||
| * and faster .. | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't follow - if you remove it, it simply isn't present, that shouldn't cause any issues, nothing checks that a node is 100% used with child nodes
| config FLASH_LOAD_OFFSET | ||
| default 0x2c000 if !USE_DT_CODE_PARTITION |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
use dt Kconfig functions to get this value
This pull request adds dts files required to support nrf9280pdk iron variant for the next Nordic secure firmware.
Modifications are spread through Drivers, Firmware and Soc files.