dts: renesas: ra: remove all interrupts definition from SoC dtsi

[thenguyenyf]

Because Renesas RA device have a dynamic link mechanism between IP event and the NVIC interrupt line, it is better to move all interrupts definition to board layers. If user would like to add overlay for enable a device node, they should refer to interrupts description in dts binding to add correct interrupts information (specifier, name, ...).

To add interrupts description, #87672 is being prepared.

This PR to remove all interrupts properties from RA8x1 device SoC dtsi, move it into .dts and .overlay for enabled node, affects the following boards:

• ek_ra8m1
• ek_ra8d1
• mck_ra8t1

[soburi]

Whenever possible, commit in units that will not cause CI to fail for each commit.
In other words, instead of splitting commits into adds and deletes, make a commit that combines adds and deletes for each item you want to change.
Otherwise, it will become difficult to understand the intention of each commit.

[thenguyenyf]

Whenever possible, commit in units that will not cause CI to fail for each commit. In other words, instead of splitting commits into adds and deletes, make a commit that combines adds and deletes for each item you want to change. Otherwise, it will become difficult to understand the intention of each commit.

Let me make clear your change suggestion: Do you mean that the delete and update interrupts properties should be done in 1 commit as it possible? So, this PR should be change to one of following:

• 1 commit for board + SoC interrupts update (includes deletion in SoC dtsi and update in board dts) and commits to update all board overlays?
• 1 commit includes update for SoC dtsi, board dts and all board overlays?

[soburi]

Whenever possible, commit in units that will not cause CI to fail for each commit. In other words, instead of splitting commits into adds and deletes, make a commit that combines adds and deletes for each item you want to change. Otherwise, it will become difficult to understand the intention of each commit.

Let me make clear your change suggestion: Do you mean that the delete and update interrupts properties should be done in 1 commit as it possible? So, this PR should be change to one of following:

* 1 commit for board + SoC interrupts update (includes deletion in SoC dtsi and update in board dts) and commits to update all board overlays?

* 1 commit includes update for SoC dtsi, board dts and all board overlays?

I think what's happening here is "moving" rather than "adding and deleting".
Please group by what was "moved".

It looks like there are some changes to the PWM and port-irq values, so I think it would be fine to split these up.

Also, rtkmipilcdb00000be contains content that is not included in the PR description, so it might be a good idea to make it a separate PR.

[de-nordic]

Ext2 tests look ok

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud