Skip to content

Add DataColumn::$encodeContent #266

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

Add DataColumn::$encodeContent #266

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

vjik
Copy link
Member

@vjik vjik commented Mar 25, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature? ✔️
Breaks BC? ✔️

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.67%. Comparing base (7c2fc6c) to head (03b9a9c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #266      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     83.63%   83.67%   +0.04%     
- Complexity      626      629       +3     
============================================
  Files            51       51              
  Lines          2132     2138       +6     
============================================
+ Hits           1783     1789       +6     
  Misses          349      349              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vjik vjik requested a review from a team March 25, 2025 14:10
@vjik vjik requested a review from samdark March 26, 2025 06:43
@vjik vjik merged commit 6d81bd5 into master Mar 26, 2025
22 checks passed
@vjik vjik deleted the data-content branch March 26, 2025 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants