Skip to content

deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.4 #1648

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 23, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.2.5 -> 29.3.4 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.3.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: fix TsJestTransformerOptions type (3b11e29), closes #​4247
  • fix(cli): fix wrong path for preset creator fns (249eb2c)
  • fix(config): disable rewriteRelativeImportExtensions always (9b1f472), closes #​4855

v29.3.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v29.3.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: transpile js files from node_modules whenever Jest asks (968370e), closes #​4637

v29.3.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: allow isolatedModules mode to have ts.Program under Node16/Next (25157eb)
  • fix: improve message for isolatedModules of ts-jest config (547eb6f)

v29.3.0

Compare Source

Features
  • feat: support hybrid module values for isolatedModules: true (f372121)
Bug Fixes
  • fix: set customConditions to undefined in TsCompiler (b091d70), closes #​4620
Code Refactoring
  • refactor: remove manual version checker (89458fc)
  • refactor: remove patching deps based on version checker (bac4c43)
  • refactor: deprecate RawCompilerOptions interface (2b1b6cd)
  • refactor: deprecate transform option isolatedModules (7dfef71)

v29.2.6

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 23, 2025 14:45
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Feb 23, 2025

Branch automerge failure

This PR was configured for branch automerge. However, this is not possible, so it has been raised as a PR instead.


  • Branch has one or more failed status checks

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from fcaa6e3 to a9cb134 Compare March 24, 2025 12:55
@renovate renovate bot changed the title deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.6 deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.0 Mar 24, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from a9cb134 to 9be4eab Compare March 31, 2025 20:28
@renovate renovate bot changed the title deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.0 deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.1 Mar 31, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from 9be4eab to a27e1eb Compare April 13, 2025 10:26
@renovate renovate bot changed the title deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.1 deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.2 Apr 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from a27e1eb to 3e8c97b Compare May 14, 2025 19:45
@renovate renovate bot changed the title deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.2 deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.3 May 14, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch from 3e8c97b to 3fae7ad Compare May 16, 2025 20:16
@renovate renovate bot changed the title deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.3 deps(dev): update dependency ts-jest to v29.3.4 May 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants