docs: introduce @swc/react-compiler to make react-compiler fast #10823
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for rspack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
GiveMe-A-Name
requested review from
chenjiahan and
Copilot
and removed request for
chenjiahan
github-actions
bot
added
the
release: document
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
website/docs/en/guide/tech/react.mdx
Outdated
| { | ||
| // Must be run before 'builtin:swc-loader' to ensure that the file is processed by the React Compiler | ||
| // So we add it to the beginning of the rule | ||
| test: (resouce) => /\.jsx$/.test(resouce) && isReactCompilerRequiredSync(fs.readFileSync(resouce)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm curious about the performance impact of readFileSync , can we do a performance comparison test to verify the performance difference between @swc/react-compiler and the previous babel-loader?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Got it, i will check it later
github-actions
bot
added
the
team
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Just out of curiosity, are we already use @swc/react-compiler to use the react-compiler compling on jsx files? or only use the I was looking for use react-compiler with swc, but the links leads me here. 😀 |
|
Currently @swc/react-compiler only provides the Unfortunately, in our early tests, |
Summary
We are introducing a recommendation to use
@swc/react-compilerfor pre-compilation to reduce the number of files processed bybabel-loader, which is known to add significant compilation time.Related links
Checklist