-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
[Misc] loose new-model tagger conditions #20747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Isotr0py, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to streamline the process for new contributors by simplifying the automated tagging conditions for pull requests that introduce new models. By loosening these conditions, it reduces the likelihood of new contributors missing specific file updates that were previously required to trigger the 'new-model' tagger.
Highlights
- Mergify Automation Update: I've updated the Mergify configuration to relax the conditions for automatically applying a label (likely related to new model contributions). Previously, a pull request needed to modify
tests/models/registry.py
anddocs/models/supported_models.md
in addition to model and registry files to trigger this automation. These two specific file modification requirements have now been removed.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to simplify the process for adding new models by relaxing the conditions for applying the new-model
tag in the Mergify configuration. The change removes the requirement for pull requests to modify tests/models/registry.py
and docs/models/supported_models.md
.
My review finds that while removing the test registry check is safe due to an existing CI test that provides coverage, removing the documentation check introduces a risk of the supported models documentation becoming outdated. I've left a comment to discuss this trade-off and suggest a less strict alternative to ensure documentation quality is maintained.
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>
Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
supported_models.md
andexamples
for a new model.Purpose
Test Plan
Test Result
(Optional) Documentation Update