-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.7k
[Benchmarks] Add memory tracking to serving benchmark #20519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Benchmarks] Add memory tracking to serving benchmark #20519
Conversation
Signed-off-by: sfeng33 <4florafeng@gmail.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @sfeng33, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the benchmark_serving.py
script by introducing comprehensive memory usage tracking. It adds two new metrics, peak memory usage and memory per request, which are now reported in both the console output and the JSON results. This provides critical insights into the memory footprint of serving models, addressing a partial fix for issue #16353 and laying the groundwork for future memory regression detection.
Highlights
- Memory Tracking Integration: Integrated peak memory usage tracking into
benchmark_serving.py
to capturepeak_memory_gb
andmemory_per_request_mb
. - New Metrics: Introduced two new metrics,
peak_memory_gb
andmemory_per_request_mb
, to the benchmark results, providing deeper insights into memory consumption during serving. - Reporting Enhancements: Updated the benchmark output (console and JSON) and documentation (README, buildkite descriptions) to include and display these newly tracked memory metrics.
- Cross-Platform Memory Utility: Added a
get_memory_usage
utility function inbenchmark_utils.py
that leveragesresource.getrusage
to accurately measure peak memory across different operating systems (Linux/macOS).
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds memory tracking to the serving benchmark. However, there's a critical cross-platform compatibility issue in benchmark_utils.py
due to the use of the resource
module, which will cause the code to fail on Windows. I've provided comments and suggestions to address this, as well as a minor suggestion to improve documentation.
.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…ons.md Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
Partially fix #16353
Add memory usage tracking to benchmark_serving.py via two new metrics: peak_memory_gb and memory_per_request_mb.
These memory metrics will automatically be appended to the JSON output in the included in existing CI (for text model).
Test Plan
Run benchmark_serving.py with command:
Test Output
Remaining work (Future PRs)