Skip to content

Conversation

JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented May 18, 2025

Important

Renamed package from lib-boilerplate to oxc-jest, updated CI/CD configurations, and replaced lint-staged with nano-staged.

  • Package Renaming:
    • Rename package from lib-boilerplate to oxc-jest in README.md, package.json, and test/basic.spec.ts.
    • Update repository links and badges in README.md to reflect new package name.
  • CI/CD:
    • Add Node.js version 24 to the matrix in .github/workflows/ci.yml.
    • Update commit and title in .github/workflows/release.yml to chore: release oxc-jest.
  • Tooling:
    • Replace .lintstagedrc.js with .nano-staged.js for lint-staging configuration.
    • Update package.json scripts and dependencies to use nano-staged and premove instead of lint-staged and rimraf.

This description was created by Ellipsis for f186af0. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@JounQin JounQin requested a review from Copilot May 18, 2025 06:25
@JounQin JounQin self-assigned this May 18, 2025
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 18, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f186af0

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 18, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JounQin has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 940afed and f186af0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .changeset/config.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pkg-pr-new.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
  • .lintstagedrc.js (0 hunks)
  • .nano-staged.js (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • index.d.cts (0 hunks)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • test/basic.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • vercel.json (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (940afed) to head (f186af0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #3   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            3         3           
  Branches         1         1           
=========================================
  Hits             3         3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented May 18, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/un-ts/oxc-jest@3

commit: f186af0

Copy link

📊 Package size report   -1.71%↓

File Before After
index.d.cts 47 B
lib/index.cjs 84 B 40%↑118 B
lib/index.d.cts 99 B
package.json 3.4 kB -4.02%↓3.2 kB
README.md 4.6 kB -2.42%↓4.5 kB
Total (Includes all files) 9.5 kB -1.71%↓9.3 kB
Tarball size 3.5 kB 0.6%↑3.5 kB
Unchanged files
File Size
lib/index.d.ts 40 B
lib/index.js 95 B
lib/index.js.map 163 B
LICENSE 1.1 kB

🤖 This report was automatically generated by pkg-size-action

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR renames the package from lib-boilerplate to oxc-jest, updates all references (code, CI/workflows, docs), and bumps various dev dependency versions while adjusting build scripts and staging configs.

  • Rename package, repository, imports, and Vercel alias to oxc-jest
  • Replace lint-staged with nano-staged and adjust scripts
  • Update CI workflows, changeset config, and README badges

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 12 out of 12 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
vercel.json Update Vercel alias to oxc-jest.vercel.app
test/basic.spec.ts Change import path to oxc-jest
package.json Rename package, update scripts, dependencies, and publishConfig
index.d.cts Remove legacy root types file
README.md Update title, badges, and install instructions
.nano-staged.js Add nano-staged config
.lintstagedrc.js Remove outdated lint-staged config
.github/workflows/release.yml Update release commit/title to oxc-jest
.github/workflows/pkg-pr-new.yml Comment out --compact flag
.github/workflows/ci.yml Add Node.js v24 to CI matrix
.changeset/config.json Update Changesets repo reference
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

package.json:14

  • The root exports field points to the TypeScript source instead of the compiled output. Update it to reference ./lib/index.js or align with the publishConfig.exports to ensure correct resolution for consumers.
"exports": "./src/index.ts",

Copy link

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
lib/index.js 39 B (0%)

Copy link

Deploy preview for oxc-jest ready!

✅ Preview
https://oxc-jest-8zic4cez9-1stg.vercel.app

Built with commit f186af0.
This pull request is being automatically deployed with vercel-action

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to f186af0 in 1 minute and 9 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 261 lines of code in 10 files
  • Skipped 2 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 10 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .github/workflows/ci.yml:20
  • Draft comment:
    Added Node.js 24 to the test matrix; ensure all dependencies are compatible with Node 24.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
2. .github/workflows/pkg-pr-new.yml:31
  • Draft comment:
    The '--compact' flag has been commented out; remove it if no longer needed.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
3. .github/workflows/release.yml:40
  • Draft comment:
    Updated release commit and title to 'oxc-jest' to match the renamed package.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
4. .nano-staged.js:1
  • Draft comment:
    Switched from lint-staged to nano-staged; verify that the integration meets your linting needs.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
5. README.md:1
  • Draft comment:
    Updated all README references and badges to 'oxc-jest'; double-check that all links and instructions are correct.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
6. package.json:2
  • Draft comment:
    Renamed the package and updated the repository URL to 'oxc-jest'; ensure this aligns with your distribution plans.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
7. package.json:22
  • Draft comment:
    Replaced the removed 'build:r' script with 'build:tsdown' for generating the CJS build; confirm that the output meets your expectations.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
8. package.json:23
  • Draft comment:
    Updated the 'clean' script to use 'premove' instead of 'rimraf'; verify that cleanup works as expected across environments.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
9. test/basic.spec.ts:1
  • Draft comment:
    Import updated to 'oxc-jest' to reflect the package renaming.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
10. vercel.json:4
  • Draft comment:
    Updated the Vercel alias to 'oxc-jest.vercel.app'; ensure the rewrite rules and trailing slash configuration are intended for this deployment.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_TYo7wlcU2EQ3fH3u

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented May 18, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 940afed1
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (940afed) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (f186af0) 6 6 100.00%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#3) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

@JounQin JounQin merged commit e284b5d into main May 18, 2025
43 of 66 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the chore/placeholder branch May 18, 2025 07:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant