Skip to content

chore: production payment setup #3128

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

phatgg221
Copy link
Collaborator

@phatgg221 phatgg221 commented Jun 19, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated icon imports in the billing interface to use an external icon package.
    • Centralized environment detection and base URL configuration for payment processing, ensuring URLs adjust automatically between development and production.
    • Improved Polar API client configuration to automatically select the correct server environment based on deployment context.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jun 19, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge-queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update environment-based configuration for external service endpoints and icon imports. The Polar API client and webhook logic now select between sandbox and production servers based on the environment. The payment route dynamically sets URLs and removes an unused field. Icon imports in the billing client are switched to an external library.

Changes

Files / Areas Changed Summary
apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts
apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts
Polar API client/server configuration now switches between sandbox and production based on environment.
apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts Added environment constants; BASE_URL is now dynamic; successUrl uses BASE_URL; removed externalCustomerId.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx Icon imports changed from local UI library to lucide-react.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API_Route
    participant PolarAPI

    Client->>API_Route: Initiate payment request
    API_Route->>API_Route: Determine environment (dev/prod)
    API_Route->>API_Route: Set BASE_URL accordingly
    API_Route->>PolarAPI: Create checkout session with dynamic successUrl
    PolarAPI-->>API_Route: Respond with session info
    API_Route-->>Client: Return checkout session response
Loading

Suggested labels

upskii

Poem

In fields of code where rabbits hop,
URLs and servers swap and pop.
Sandbox here, production there—
The right address, handled with care!
With icons bright from lucide's den,
Our dashboard shines anew again.
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 9.29.0

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package '@typescript-eslint/parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at Object.getPackageJSONURL (node:internal/modules/package_json_reader:255:9)
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:767:81)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:853:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:801:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:725:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:708:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:309:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:201:49)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b3d157 and 41b80f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts

[warning] 10-14: apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts#L10-L14
Added lines #L10 - L14 were not covered by tests


[warning] 67-68: apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts#L67-L68
Added lines #L67 - L68 were not covered by tests

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Verify generated types
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts (1)

67-68: Verify the commented externalCustomerId and add test coverage.

The dynamic successUrl using BASE_URL is a good improvement for environment-aware configuration.

However, clarify whether commenting out externalCustomerId is intentional. This field might be important for customer tracking and payment reconciliation.

Also, these payment-critical lines lack test coverage, which poses risks for production payment flows.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if externalCustomerId is used elsewhere in the codebase
# Expected: Usage patterns that might indicate if this field is still needed

rg -A 3 -B 3 "externalCustomerId" --type ts
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch feat-polar-payment-production-setup

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @phatgg221, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on adapting the payment integration to work correctly across development and production environments. It introduces environment-aware configurations for the Polar payment gateway, ensuring that the correct server mode and success URLs are used based on the deployment environment. Additionally, it includes a minor update to the icon library used in the billing client.

Highlights

  • Environment-aware Payment Configuration: Configured the Polar payment API clients (polarAdmin and api) and webhooks to dynamically switch between 'sandbox' and 'production' server modes based on the NODE_ENV environment variable.
  • Dynamic Success URL Handling: Introduced DEV_MODE, PROD_MODE, and BASE_URL constants in the payment route. The BASE_URL is now used to construct the successUrl for Polar checkout sessions, ensuring correct redirects to http://localhost:7803 in development and https://tuturuuu.com in production.
  • Payment Customer ID Adjustment: The externalCustomerId parameter has been commented out when creating Polar checkout sessions in the payment route.
  • Icon Library Update: Switched the icon import in billing-client.tsx from @tuturuuu/ui/icons to lucide-react.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.80%. Comparing base (349ce4d) to head (41b80f2).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...eb/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
[...ale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx](https://app.codecov.io/gh/tutur3u/platform/pull/3128?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=apps%2Fweb%2Fsrc%2Fapp%2F%5Blocale%5D%2F%28dashboard%29%2F%5BwsId%5D%2Fbilling%2Fbilling-client.tsx&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=tutur3u#diff-YXBwcy93ZWIvc3JjL2FwcC9bbG9jYWxlXS8oZGFzaGJvYXJkKS9bd3NJZF0vYmlsbGluZy9iaWxsaW5nLWNsaWVudC50c3g=) 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3128      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage    0.80%    0.80%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2541     2541              
  Lines      323839   323844       +5     
  Branches     3042     3042              
==========================================
  Hits         2621     2621              
- Misses     319050   319055       +5     
  Partials     2168     2168              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces changes to the payment setup, including environment-based configurations for development and production modes, updates to the checkout session creation, and modifications to webhook handling. The changes ensure that the application behaves differently based on the environment it's running in, particularly for payment processing and webhook interactions.

Comment on lines 6 to 7
export const DEV_MODE = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development';
export const PROD_MODE = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production';

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider consolidating these environment checks into a single utility function or configuration file to avoid repetition and ensure consistency across the application.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts (1)

6-8: Remove unused environment constants.

DEV_MODE and PROD_MODE are defined but never used in this file.

-export const DEV_MODE = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development';
-export const PROD_MODE = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production';
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 349ce4d and 8b3d157.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx

[warning] 5-12: apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx#L5-L12
Added lines #L5 - L12 were not covered by tests

apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts

[warning] 7-7: apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts#L7
Added line #L7 was not covered by tests

apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts

[warning] 5-5: apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts#L5
Added line #L5 was not covered by tests

apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts

[warning] 69-70: apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts#L69-L70
Added lines #L69 - L70 were not covered by tests

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Verify generated types
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
  • GitHub Check: Deploy-Preview
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/billing/billing-client.tsx (1)

5-5: LGTM! Clean icon library migration.

The switch from the local UI library to lucide-react for icons is a straightforward dependency change that maintains the same functionality.

apps/web/src/lib/polar.ts (1)

5-5: Verify security implications of public access token usage.

The environment-based server selection looks correct for production setup. However, ensure that NEXT_PUBLIC_POLAR_ACCESS_TOKEN being public is intentional, as this could expose the token in client-side bundles.

Also consider handling other environments explicitly:

-  server: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? 'sandbox' : 'production',
+  server: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? 'sandbox' : 
+          process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test' ? 'sandbox' : 'production',
apps/web/src/app/api/webhooks/route.ts (1)

7-7: Consistent environment configuration - good alignment.

The dynamic server selection matches the pattern in polar.ts, ensuring consistent environment handling across Polar clients.

Same security consideration applies here - verify that using NEXT_PUBLIC_POLAR_ACCESS_TOKEN in server-side code is intentional, as this token will be exposed in client bundles.

apps/web/src/app/api/[wsId]/[productId]/payment/route.ts (2)

9-12: Verify the localhost port configuration.

The BASE_URL uses port 7803 for development. Ensure this matches your local development setup, as Next.js typically defaults to port 3000.


69-70: Verify impact of removing externalCustomerId.

The externalCustomerId field has been commented out. Ensure this doesn't break customer tracking or subscription management workflows in your payment provider.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to externalCustomerId to assess impact
rg -A 3 -B 3 "externalCustomerId"

@vhpx vhpx merged commit ea0dd85 into main Jun 19, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@vhpx vhpx deleted the feat-polar-payment-production-setup branch June 19, 2025 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants