Skip to content

hotfix: stop debug logs and healthcheck no longer requires prisma #2108

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ericallam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 26, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: fc1b548

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes across the codebase involve simplifying and disabling several API route handlers and the health check endpoint. In two API routes related to debug log recording, the original implementations—which included parameter validation, database operations, event recording, and detailed error handling—have been commented out and replaced with minimal action() functions that return a static 204 No Content response without any processing. Similarly, the health check route has been modified to remove the database user count query, now returning a static "OK" response without interacting with the database. All previous logic and dependencies for these endpoints have been effectively bypassed or removed.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/routes/engine.v1.worker-actions.runs.$runFriendlyId.logs.debug.ts (1)

8-43: Consistent implementation with the dev route.

This follows the same pattern as the dev route handler. The stub implementation is correct for disabling the endpoint.

Consider applying the same improvements suggested for the previous file:

  1. Remove the commented code if permanent, or add a TODO if temporary
  2. Update the comment to explain why this endpoint is disabled
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/webapp/app/routes/engine.v1.dev.runs.$runFriendlyId.logs.debug.ts (3)

1-13: Clean up unused imports.

Most of these imports are no longer used after commenting out the main functionality. Consider removing or commenting out the unused imports to improve code clarity.

-import { TypedResponse } from "@remix-run/server-runtime";
-import { assertExhaustive } from "@trigger.dev/core/utils";
-import { RunId } from "@trigger.dev/core/v3/isomorphic";
-import {
-  WorkerApiDebugLogBody,
-  WorkerApiRunAttemptStartResponseBody,
-} from "@trigger.dev/core/v3/workers";
-import { z } from "zod";
-import { prisma } from "~/db.server";
-import { logger } from "~/services/logger.server";
-import { createActionApiRoute } from "~/services/routeBuilders/apiBuilder.server";
-import { recordRunDebugLog } from "~/v3/eventRepository.server";

14-74: Consider removing commented code or adding a TODO comment.

Large blocks of commented code can reduce code readability. Since this is labeled as a hotfix:

  • If this change is permanent, consider deleting the commented code entirely
  • If temporary, add a TODO comment explaining when and why this should be restored
+// TODO: Temporarily disabled debug logging for performance reasons. 
+// Restore this functionality after [specific condition or date]
 // const { action } = createActionApiRoute(

76-79: Add documentation for the stub implementation.

The stub implementation correctly returns 204 No Content. Consider adding a comment explaining why this endpoint is disabled to help future developers understand the context.

-// Create a generic JSON action in remix
+// Temporarily disabled debug logging endpoint - returns 204 No Content without processing
+// See PR #2108 for context
 export function action() {
   return new Response(null, { status: 204 });
 }
apps/webapp/app/routes/engine.v1.worker-actions.runs.$runFriendlyId.logs.debug.ts (1)

1-6: Remove unused imports.

Similar to the previous file, these imports are no longer used and should be cleaned up.

-import { assertExhaustive } from "@trigger.dev/core/utils";
-import { RunId } from "@trigger.dev/core/v3/isomorphic";
-import { WorkerApiDebugLogBody } from "@trigger.dev/core/v3/runEngineWorker";
-import { z } from "zod";
-import { createActionWorkerApiRoute } from "~/services/routeBuilders/apiBuilder.server";
-import { recordRunDebugLog } from "~/v3/eventRepository.server";
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e84ede9 and fc1b548.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/webapp/app/routes/engine.v1.dev.runs.$runFriendlyId.logs.debug.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/routes/engine.v1.worker-actions.runs.$runFriendlyId.logs.debug.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/webapp/app/routes/healthcheck.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/routes/healthcheck.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (25)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (10, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (9, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 10)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

@ericallam ericallam closed this May 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants