-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
Mekhanik evgenii/1411 7 #2403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Mekhanik evgenii/1411 7 #2403
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b8abe5f
Allocate extra space during huffman decoding
EvgeniiMekhanik 2ef546d
Imrove memory usage during huffman decoding
EvgeniiMekhanik 99c77aa
Use unify strategy for hpack memory allocation
EvgeniiMekhanik a4647fd
Fix according review
EvgeniiMekhanik File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2230,4 +2230,4 @@ void | |
tfw_apm_exit(void) | ||
{ | ||
tfw_mod_unregister(&tfw_apm_mod); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here we have a discussion with @const-t and can't find a solution. Previously we allocate memory only once
data = tfw_pool_alloc_not_align(it->pool, s_hdr->len)
but this could lead to memory loss if there is no enough memory in pool and we allocate new pages. Now I add extra if in the loop and don't loose memory. Whats better? We can calltfw_hpack_buffer_get
only once with true flag at the beginning of the function but loose memory as it was before. @krizhanovsky what do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There shouldn't be a lot of chunks, so the loop should be short. I think we're fine, at least none of us is able to say what is better with confedence and it doesn't make sense to microbenchmark this place