Skip to content

fix: #90 #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

w4terlaw
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@w4terlaw w4terlaw force-pushed the fix/90-regression-queue-function branch from fa7800d to 5b79035 Compare May 23, 2025 16:23
@yann-combarnous
Copy link
Contributor

Thx @w4terlaw .

@Lancetnik , FYI, this fixes regression #90 .

It may be good to add a test for functions and generators, not just messages to avoid future regressions.

@w4terlaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

w4terlaw commented May 24, 2025

Yep, I’ll add tests. And yeah, good to check that labels keep their type.

It may be good to add a test for functions and generators, not just messages to avoid future regressions.

@Lancetnik
Copy link
Collaborator

@yann-combarnous sorry, I was sure, that we have such tests

Copy link
Collaborator

@Lancetnik Lancetnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add a tests for generators as a message, please?

@w4terlaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes

I’ll add tests

@Lancetnik Lancetnik merged commit c354c1b into taskiq-python:develop Jun 7, 2025
8 checks passed
@w4terlaw w4terlaw deleted the fix/90-regression-queue-function branch June 12, 2025 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants