Split the Java2Swift tool out into a library target and add a test harness #73
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rness Introduce a test harness so we can run the Java-to-Swift API translator against a Java class and then check the generated syntax. We could definitely do better with the diff'ing of lines to make it a little easier to use, but it's better than no testing.
ktoso
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2024
| .executableTarget( | ||
| name: "Java2Swift", | ||
| .target( | ||
| name: "Java2SwiftLib", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure about the “lib” suffix tbh, just java2swift is fine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd have to rename the executable target to drop the Lib suffix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduce a test harness so we can run the Java-to-Swift API translator against a Java class and then check the generated syntax. We could definitely do better with the diff'ing of lines to make it a little easier to use, but it's better than no testing.