Support concurrent use of a shared JavaVirtualMachine
#69
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
JavaVirtualMachine
class was not at all designed with concurrency in mind: it always created a new Java VM under the hood, and was associated with a single JNI environment even though different threads could have different JNI environments.Move to a different model with a
static shared()
method to create or access a sharedJavaVirtualMachine
instance to encapsulate the (singleton) JVM. If there is an existing JVM, whether created via this Swift library or from some other code, it will be adopted by the sharedJavaVirtualMachine
instance.Additionally, the
JavaVirtualMachine
no longer stores a JNI environment. Instead, it now provides anenvironment
function that queries the JVM to get the JNI environment for the current thread. If the current thread isn't attached to the JVM, it does so and provides the resulting JNI environment.With all of these in place, we no longer need to force all of our JavaKit tests over to the main actor.