Skip to content

build: add proper search path for Windows #162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd commented Nov 8, 2024

The Windows includes are under win32 at least with the Oracle JDK. This is required to be able to build on Windows.

The Windows includes are under `win32` at least with the Oracle JDK.
This is required to be able to build on Windows.
@ktoso
Copy link
Collaborator

ktoso commented Nov 8, 2024

Thanks for the fix, there's probably some / vs \ laying around as well.

Thanks!

@ktoso
Copy link
Collaborator

ktoso commented Nov 8, 2024

We don't do Windows CI yet but we could soon, are you planning on some more work here?

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Nov 8, 2024

Yes, I'm planning on continuing some additional work here for exposing Java to Swift.

@ktoso
Copy link
Collaborator

ktoso commented Nov 8, 2024

Ok, awesome! Let's get the repo into shape to support windows then :-)

Sorry for the delay, I'll get CI green tomorrow and merge all such pending PRs. Since we use nightly toolchain it regressed us accidentally

Copy link
Member

@DougGregor DougGregor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@ktoso ktoso merged commit c47a697 into swiftlang:main Nov 8, 2024
11 checks passed
@ktoso
Copy link
Collaborator

ktoso commented Nov 8, 2024

Thanks @compnerd!

@compnerd compnerd deleted the search branch November 9, 2024 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants