Java2Swift: Separate "reference type" from "value type" mappings #131
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
While in general we want to map Java classes to Swift value types, there are places where we need to work with the class type, such as generic parameters. Identify those places where it is okay to bridge to a value type (e.g., parameters, results, field types) and do so. Elsewhere, use the Swift type that directly wraps the Java class. For example, when dealing with superclasses or with generic arguments to Java generic classes. As part of this, provide a class mapping for java.lang.String (as JavaString) and Java arrays (as the non-generic JavaArray) so we have a way to refer to such types in positions that cannot use the value type. Test this out with a few APIs that need it. Fixes issue swiftlang#128.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While in general we want to map Java classes to Swift value types, there are places where we need to work with the class type, such as generic parameters. Identify those places where it is okay to bridge to a value type (e.g., parameters, results, field types) and do so.
Elsewhere, use the Swift type that directly wraps the Java class. For example, when dealing with superclasses or with generic arguments to Java generic classes.
As part of this, provide a class mapping for java.lang.String (as JavaString) and Java arrays (as the non-generic JavaArray) so we have a way to refer to such types in positions that cannot use the value type. Test this out with a few APIs that need it.
Fixes issue #128.