Skip to content

Update and improve zh-TW Traditional Chinese locale #1297

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

PeterDaveHello
Copy link
Contributor

Just update and improve the zh-TW Traditional Chinese locale.

Summary generated by GitHub Copilot:

This pull request includes several updates to the Traditional Chinese (zh-TW) localization file. The changes focus on improving the consistency and formality of the language used throughout the application.

Key updates include:

Language Consistency and Formality:

  • Updated various phrases to use more formal language, replacing informal pronouns and expressions with their formal counterparts.
  • Changed month names to use numeric representations with a space and the character "月" for clarity.

Terminology Standardization:

  • Standardized the term "RSS" across different contexts, replacing inconsistent terms like "訊息來源" with "RSS".
  • Updated action labels and messages to ensure consistent terminology, such as replacing "加星號標記的文章" with "星號標記的文章".

User Interface Improvements:

  • Enhanced descriptions and instructions to be clearer and more user-friendly, such as updating the import description to "從其他服務匯入您的 RSS 訂閱".
  • Improved feedback messages to users, ensuring they are polite and informative, like changing "你的訂閱已經新增完畢,請稍等一段時間再回來查看" to "您的訂閱已經新增完畢,請稍候一段時間再回來確認".

Additional Features:

  • Added new sections for password updates and profile editing, providing clear success and failure messages.

These updates aim to enhance the user experience by providing a more professional and consistent interface for Traditional Chinese-speaking users.

@mockdeep mockdeep merged commit 94cec8c into stringer-rss:main Apr 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@mockdeep
Copy link
Collaborator

mockdeep commented Apr 3, 2025

@PeterDaveHello thanks for contributing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants