Skip to content

Experimentation with execution pipelines #1947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Stringy
Copy link
Collaborator

@Stringy Stringy commented Nov 11, 2024

Description

Intended as a way of constructing execution graphs, and ultimately in support of multiple data sources above and beyond Falco.

Checklist

  • Investigated and inspected CI test results
  • Updated documentation accordingly

Automated testing

  • Added unit tests
  • Added integration tests
  • Added regression tests

If any of these don't apply, please comment below.

Testing Performed

TODO(replace-me)
Use this space to explain how you tested your PR, or, if you didn't test it, why you did not do so. (Valid reasons include "CI is sufficient" or "No testable changes")
In addition to reviewing your code, reviewers must also review your testing instructions, and make sure they are sufficient.

For more details, ref the Confluence page about this section.

@Stringy Stringy force-pushed the giles/execution-pipeline branch from 8021cc8 to 2aec857 Compare June 20, 2025 10:15
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 20, 2025

❌ 1 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
18 1 17 0
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time
NetworkStatusNotifierTest::NetworkStatusNotifierTest
Stack Traces | 0.161s run time

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants