Skip to content

Adding section to analysis utils package #591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ArturU043
Copy link
Contributor

Added a section to the documentation about the parallel package with extra tools.

The section does not go into details and points to the GH repo and the documentation.

I investigated the functionalities of the intersphinx extension. They could be useful if the second package grows and information has to be added more extensively to the client's doc. For now just pointing to links is enough.

I placed this section after the CLI module.

@ArturU043 ArturU043 requested a review from BenGalewsky May 14, 2025 14:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.19%. Comparing base (8f9e76b) to head (ef8c785).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #591   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.19%   96.19%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1865     1865           
=======================================
  Hits         1794     1794           
  Misses         71       71           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.19% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ArturU043 ArturU043 requested a review from gordonwatts May 19, 2025 16:48
Copy link
Contributor

@BenGalewsky BenGalewsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks

@ponyisi ponyisi merged commit 2e24a67 into master May 22, 2025
28 of 37 checks passed
@ponyisi ponyisi deleted the docs/analysis-utils-package branch May 22, 2025 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants