Skip to content

Avoid attempting to serve blobs after Fulu fork #7756

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: unstable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Avoid attempting to serve blobs after Fulu fork #7756

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

chong-he
Copy link
Member

@chong-he chong-he requested a review from jxs as a code owner July 18, 2025 01:33
@chong-he chong-he added the work-in-progress PR is a work-in-progress label Jul 18, 2025
@chong-he chong-he changed the title Das blobs by range Do not response to blobs request after Fulu fork Jul 18, 2025
@chong-he chong-he changed the title Do not response to blobs request after Fulu fork Avoid attempting to serve Blobs after Fulu fork Jul 18, 2025
@chong-he chong-he changed the title Avoid attempting to serve Blobs after Fulu fork Avoid attempting to serve blobs after Fulu fork Jul 18, 2025
@chong-he chong-he added ready-for-review The code is ready for review fulu Required for the upcoming Fulu hard fork and removed work-in-progress PR is a work-in-progress labels Jul 22, 2025
@chong-he chong-he requested a review from jimmygchen July 22, 2025 01:15
@jimmygchen jimmygchen mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jxs jxs Awaiting requested review from jxs jxs is a code owner

@jimmygchen jimmygchen Awaiting requested review from jimmygchen

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fulu Required for the upcoming Fulu hard fork ready-for-review The code is ready for review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@chong-he