-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
fix(performance): #201 improve perfomance of informativeTest_6_3_8 #202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(performance): #201 improve perfomance of informativeTest_6_3_8 #202
Conversation
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
e665664
to
e34f2f0
Compare
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
hunspell.js
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Die Datei wird im csaf-validator-service
verwendet.
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still wonder about the URLs. Didn't we agree on sending them in as one word?
I think that's how we do it. In line 385 we collect all URL And in line 392 we add them as one word. |
8630428
to
5034fdc
Compare
Coverage after merging feat/#201-improve_perfomance_of_informativeTest_6_3_8 into main
Coverage Report |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rainer-exxcellent Why do you remove the check on available languages?
This catches cases where the process dies or the standard input is closed.
…gger and ts-ignore statement, add some comment
5034fdc
to
a00ed63
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comment - other than that LGTM
['1', '*'], | ||
['1', '*'], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need to this?
fix bug: missing await in checkBranches
improve performance by the following steps: