2025 council survey

surveys/micro/leadership-council-2025.md

@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+# Survey questions
+
+One of the responsibilities of the [leadership council](https://www.rust-lang.org/governance/teams/leadership-council),
+formed by [RFC 3392](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3392-leadership-council.html),
+is to solicit feedback on a yearly basis from the Project on how we are performing
+our duties.
+
+> Each year, the Council must solicit feedback on whether the Council is
+> serving its purpose effectively from all willing and able Project members and
+> openly discuss this feedback in a forum that allows and encourages active
+> participation from all Project members. To do so, the Council and other
+> Project members consult the high-level duties, expectations, and constraints
+> listed in this RFC and any subsequent revisions thereof to determine if the
+> Council is meeting its duties and obligations.
+
+This is a quick annual survey for Rust-lang project members to provide feedback
+on the Leadership Council. Your feedback is appreciated to help steer the
+Council activities. As always, if you have specific questions or feedback that
+you would like to provide, feel free to reach out to any Council member with
+questions.
+
+This survey is anonymous. The Council will go through all answers and release a
+summary after the survey is complete, similar to the one published
+[last year](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/08/26/council-survey/).
+
+## Who are you?
+
+These questions will help us determine if there's differences in how we're
+doing across areas of the project.
+
+### Do you consider yourself a member of the Rust Project?
+
+Type: select one (required)
+
+- Yes
+- No
+
+### What teams/areas of the project do you regularly participate in?
+
+Note that these are the top-level teams for lack of better project "areas".
+
+Type: select one or more (optional)
+
+- Compiler
+- Dev Tools
+- Launching Pad
+- Library
+- Infrastructure
+- Moderation
+- Language
+
+## Leadership Council Effectiveness
+
+For each of the key [duties] outlined in RFC 3392 (quoted below), we'd like your
+input on how well the Council is performing against that duty.
+
+You may want to (re)read the last ~year of regular updates from the Council to help build context:
+
+* [2024 Q3](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2024/09/06/leadership-council-update/)
+* [2024 Q4](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2024/12/09/leadership-council-update/)
+* [2025 Q1](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2025/03/17/leadership-council-update/)
+* [2025 Q2](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2025/06/11/leadership-council-update/)
+
+See also our [spending/budget](https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/blob/main/policies/spending/budget.md).
+
+[duties]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3392-leadership-council.html#duties-expectations-and-constraints-on-the-council
+
+
+### Tracking and delegating work
+
+> Identifying, prioritizing, and tracking work that goes undone due to lack of
+> clear ownership (and not due to the owners’ explicit de-prioritization,
+> placement in a backlog, etc.).
+>
+> Delegating this work, potentially establishing new (and possibly temporary)
+> teams to own this work.
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+### Project-wide coordination
+
+> Coordinating Project-wide changes to teams, structures, or processes.
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+### Accountability
+
+> Ensuring top-level teams are accountable to their purviews, to other teams,
+> and to the Project.
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+### Providing resources for teams
+
+> Ensuring where possible that teams have the people and resources they need to
+> accomplish their work.
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+### Taking official positions
+
+> Establishing the official position, opinion, or will of the Rust Project as a
+> whole. 
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+### Accessibility of council members
+
+Do you feel that if you needed to, you could reach out to the Council as a whole or your particular
+Council representative? This includes both knowing who to contact and your
+feeling that your perspective would be heard.
+
+Type: select one (optional)
+
+- Strongly Agree
+- Agree
+- Unsure
+- Disagree
+- Strongly Disagree
+- Not enough information to comment.
+
+
+### Are there areas of the Leadership Council that you think are going well?
+
+Type: free text (optional)
+
+### Are there areas of the Leadership Council that you think could be improved or efforts that should be prioritized?
+
+Type: free text (optional)