-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
RFC: Pointer metadata & VTable #2580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 26 commits
0bb757e
d4acf9b
8de354c
24a2ff8
dd3de2f
637647f
99fbed9
74e185c
65418d0
ef9ee32
f6d95d7
e1aa0df
18f1fef
3dd1484
8ede231
fb6ebad
bf80163
2edbe38
bb5e09a
bc2a2e7
7be2349
538b9aa
e47aa6e
29c7547
1e5622f
04ba25f
f94f627
236e657
7b0175e
3ff39f0
50b567b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ | ||
- Feature Name: `ptr-meta` | ||
- Start Date: 2018-10-26 | ||
- RFC PR: | ||
- Rust Issue: | ||
|
||
# Summary | ||
[summary]: #summary | ||
|
||
Add generic APIs that allow manipulating the metadata of fat pointers: | ||
|
||
* Naming the metadata’s type (as an associated type) | ||
* Extracting metadata from a pointer | ||
* Reconstructing a pointer from a data pointer and metadata | ||
* Representing vtables, the metadata for trait objects, as a type with some limited API | ||
|
||
This RFC does *not* propose a mechanism for defining custom dynamically-sized types, | ||
but tries to stay compatible with future proposals that do. | ||
|
||
|
||
# Background | ||
[background]: #background | ||
|
||
Typical high-level code doesn’t need to worry about fat pointers, | ||
a reference `&Foo` “just works” wether or not `Foo` is a DST. | ||
But unsafe code such as a custom collection library may want to access a fat pointer’s | ||
components separately. | ||
|
||
In Rust 1.11 we *removed* a [`std::raw::Repr`] trait and a [`std::raw::Slice`] type | ||
from the standard library. | ||
`Slice` could be `transmute`d to a `&[U]` or `&mut [U]` reference to a slice | ||
as it was guaranteed to have the same memory layout. | ||
This was replaced with more specific and less wildly unsafe | ||
`std::slice::from_raw_parts` and `std::slice::from_raw_parts_mut` functions, | ||
together with `as_ptr` and `len` methods that extract each fat pointer component separatly. | ||
|
||
For trait objects, where we still have an unstable `std::raw::TraitObject` type | ||
that can only be used with `transmute`: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
#[repr(C)] | ||
pub struct TraitObject { | ||
pub data: *mut (), | ||
pub vtable: *mut (), | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
[`std::raw::Repr`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.10.0/std/raw/trait.Repr.html | ||
[`std::raw::Slice`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.10.0/std/raw/struct.Slice.html | ||
[`std::raw::TraitObjet`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.30.0/std/raw/struct.TraitObject.html | ||
|
||
|
||
# Motivation | ||
[motivation]: #motivation | ||
|
||
We now have APIs in Stable Rust to let unsafe code freely and reliably manipulate slices, | ||
accessing the separate components of a fat pointers and then re-assembling them. | ||
However `std::raw::TraitObject` is still unstable, | ||
but it’s probably not the style of API that we’ll want to stabilize | ||
as it encourages dangerous `transmute` calls. | ||
This is a “hole” in available APIs to manipulate existing Rust types. | ||
|
||
For example [this library][lib] stores multiple trait objects of varying size | ||
in contiguous memory together with their vtable pointers, | ||
and during iteration recreates fat pointers from separate data and vtable pointers. | ||
|
||
The new `Thin` trait alias also expanding to [extern types] some APIs | ||
that were unnecessarily restricted to `Sized` types | ||
because there was previously no way to express pointer-thinness in generic code. | ||
|
||
[lib]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2015&gist=bbeecccc025f5a7a0ad06086678e13f3 | ||
|
||
|
||
# Guide-level explanation | ||
[guide-level-explanation]: #guide-level-explanation | ||
|
||
|
||
Let’s build generic type similar to `Box<dyn Trait>`, | ||
but where the vtable pointer is stored in heap memory next to the value | ||
so that the pointer is thin. | ||
First, let’s get some boilerplate out of the way: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
use std::marker::{PhantomData, Unsize}; | ||
use std::ptr::{self, DynMetadata}; | ||
|
||
trait DynTrait = Pointee<Metadata=DynMetadata>; | ||
|
||
pub struct ThinBox<Dyn: ?Sized + DynTrait> { | ||
ptr: ptr::NonNull<WithMeta<()>>, | ||
phantom: PhantomData<Dyn>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[repr(C)] | ||
struct WithMeta<T: ?Sized> { | ||
vtable: DynMetadata, | ||
value: T, | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Since [unsized rvalues] are not implemented yet, | ||
our constructor is going to “unsize” from a concrete type that implements our trait. | ||
The `Unsize` bound ensures we can cast from `&S` to a `&Dyn` trait object | ||
and construct the appopriate metadata. | ||
|
||
[unsized rvalues]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48055 | ||
|
||
We let `Box` do the memory layout computation and allocation: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
impl<Dyn: ?Sized + DynTrait> ThinBox<Dyn> { | ||
pub fn new_unsize<S>(value: S) -> Self where S: Unsize<Dyn> { | ||
let vtable = ptr::metadata(&value as &Dyn); | ||
let ptr = NonNull::from(Box::leak(Box::new(WithMeta { vtable, value }))).cast(); | ||
ThinBox { ptr, phantom: PhantomData } | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
(Another possible constructor is `pub fn new_copy(value: &Dyn) where Dyn: Copy`, | ||
but it would involve slightly more code.) | ||
|
||
Accessing the value requires knowing its alignment: | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
impl<Dyn: ?Sized + DynTrait> ThinBox<Dyn> { | ||
fn data_ptr(&self) -> *mut () { | ||
unsafe { | ||
let offset = std::mem::size_of::<DynMetadata>(); | ||
let value_align = self.ptr.as_ref().vtable.align(); | ||
let offset = align_up_to(offset, value_align); | ||
(self.ptr.as_ptr() as *mut u8).add(offset) as *mut () | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.30.0/src/libcore/alloc.rs#L199-L219> | ||
fn align_up_to(offset: usize, align: usize) -> usize { | ||
offset.wrapping_add(align).wrapping_sub(1) & !align.wrapping_sub(1) | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Similarly Deref | ||
impl<Dyn: ?Sized + DynTrait> DerefMut for ThinBox<Dyn> { | ||
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Dyn { | ||
unsafe { | ||
&mut *<*mut Dyn>::from_raw_parts(self.data_ptr(), *self.ptr.as_ref().vtable) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Finally, in `Drop` we may not be able to take advantage of `Box` again | ||
since the original `Sized` type `S` is not statically known at this point. | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
impl<Dyn: ?Sized + DynTrait> Drop for ThinBox<Dyn> { | ||
fn drop(&mut self) { | ||
unsafe { | ||
let layout = /* left as an exercise for the reader */; | ||
ptr::drop_in_place::<Dyn>(&mut **self); | ||
alloc::dealloc(self.ptr.cast(), layout); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
# Reference-level explanation | ||
[reference-level-explanation]: #reference-level-explanation | ||
|
||
The APIs whose full definition is found below | ||
are added to `core::ptr` and re-exported in `std::ptr`: | ||
|
||
* A `Pointee` trait, | ||
implemented automatically for all types | ||
(similar to how `Sized` and `Unsize` are implemented automatically). | ||
* A `Thin` [trait alias]. | ||
If this RFC is implemented before type aliases are, | ||
uses of `Thin` should be replaced with its definition. | ||
* A `metadata` free function | ||
* A `DynMetadata` struct | ||
* A `from_raw_parts` constructor for each of `*const T`, `*mut T`, and `NonNull<T>`. | ||
|
||
The bounds on `null()` and `null_mut()` function in that same module | ||
as well as the `NonNull::dangling` constructor | ||
are changed from (implicit) `T: Sized` to `T: ?Sized + Thin`. | ||
Similarly for the `U` type parameter of the `NonNull::cast` method. | ||
This enables using those functions with [extern types]. | ||
|
||
The `Pointee` trait is implemented for all types. | ||
This can be relied on in generic code, | ||
even if a type parameter `T` does not have an explicit `T: Pointee` bound. | ||
This is similar to how the `Any` trait can be used without an explicit `T: Any` bound, | ||
only `T: 'static`, because a blanket `impl<T: 'static> Any for T {…}` exists. | ||
(Except that `Pointee` is not restricted to `'static`.) | ||
|
||
For the purpose of pointer casts being allowed by the `as` operator, | ||
a pointer to `T` is considered to be thin if `T: Thin` instead of `T: Sized`. | ||
This similarly includes extern types. | ||
|
||
`std::raw::TraitObject` and `std::raw` are deprecated and eventually removed. | ||
|
||
[trait alias]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41517 | ||
[extern types]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43467 | ||
|
||
```rust | ||
/// This trait is automatically implement for every type. | ||
/// | ||
/// Raw pointer types and reference types in Rust can be thought of as made of two parts: | ||
/// a data pointer that contains the memory address of the value, and some metadata. | ||
/// | ||
/// For statically-sized types (that implement the `Sized` traits) | ||
/// as well as for `extern` types, | ||
/// pointers are said to be “thin”: metadata is zero-sized and its type is `()`. | ||
/// | ||
/// Pointers to [dynamically-sized types][dst] are said to be “fat” | ||
/// and have non-zero-sized metadata: | ||
/// | ||
/// * For structs whose last field is a DST, metadata is the metadata for the last field | ||
/// * For the `str` type, metadata is the length in bytes as `usize` | ||
/// * For slice types like `[T]`, metadata is the length in items as `usize` | ||
/// * For trait objects like `dyn SomeTrait`, metadata is [`DynMetadata`]. | ||
/// | ||
/// In the future, the Rust language may gain new kinds of types | ||
/// that have different pointer metadata. | ||
/// | ||
/// Pointer metadata can be extracted from a pointer or reference with the [`metadata`] function. | ||
/// The data pointer can be extracted by casting a (fat) pointer | ||
/// to a (thin) pointer to a `Sized` type the `as` operator, | ||
/// for example `(x: &dyn SomeTrait) as *const SomeTrait as *const ()`. | ||
/// | ||
/// [dst]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/exotic-sizes.html#dynamically-sized-types-dsts | ||
#[lang = "pointee"] | ||
pub trait Pointee { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. so... I'm assuming the compiler implements default impl<T: ?Sized> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = &'static Vtable;
}
impl<T: Sized> Pointee for T {
type Metadata = ();
}
impl Pointee for str {
type Metadata = usize;
}
impl<T: Sized> Pointee for [T] {
type Metadata = usize;
} Which means theoretically we could make There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These impls would be accurate in current Rust, but what I had in mind instead was that the compiler would automatically generate impls, similar to what it does for the Regardless, yes, making |
||
/// The type for metadata in pointers and references to `Self`. | ||
type Metadata: Copy + Send + Sync + Ord + Hash + Unpin + 'static; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Having to list There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why are the trait bounds there in the first place? I can understand There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I've explained the rationale of this list in #2580 (comment) and @comex Because the following works on stable all the way back to 1.0: fn is_before<T: ?Sized>(a: *const T, b: *const T) -> bool {
a < b
} Without introducing Every other bound are included for the same reason that @RalfJung we could tweak the auto trait rule so that it needs to check There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it? This RFC proposes that this trait is automatically implemented for all types, so "manual" implementations of it cannot exist. (Unless some day the language grows types that cannot be used behind a pointer, but I can’t imagine how that would be useful. And even then, I assume we’d disallow manual impls.) And it’s only those impls that would potentially be broken by adding a new bound, right? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it really? I would expect it to be implemented as
I see. That leaves no room for custom DST though. I am aware those are out-of-scope, but they should still be possible to add in a future-compatible way I assume. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fn is_before<T: ?Sized>(a: *const T, b: *const T) -> bool {
a < b
}
#[test]
fn test() {
let a = &[1,2,3];
assert!(is_before(&a[..1], &a[..2])); // because 1 < 2
assert!(!is_before(&a[..2], &a[..1])); // because 2 > 1
} There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, that’s a good point. I suppose when custom DSTs are added, then we may need to freeze those bounds.
Indeed, it looks like fat-pointer comparison is represented specifically in MIR, and lowered to LLVM integer-comparison instructions here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1e2a73867/src/librustc_codegen_ssa/mir/rvalue.rs#L630-L642 It doesn’t call https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1e2a73867/src/libcore/ptr/mod.rs#L2930 So maybe custom DSTs would also need language-level changes in this area. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Today we have |
||
} | ||
|
||
/// Pointers to types implementing this trait alias are “thin”: | ||
/// | ||
/// ```rust | ||
/// fn this_never_panics<T: std::ptr::Thin>() { | ||
/// assert_eq!(std::mem::size_of::<&T>(), std::mem::size_of::<usize>()) | ||
/// } | ||
/// ``` | ||
pub trait Thin = Pointee<Metadata=()>; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I believe it's better to actually introduce thin pointers instead of using this trait alias. The problem is that this trait alias doesn't necessary play well with structs containing DSTs (which might again be "composed" DSTs). It should be possible to have a thin pointer to such a struct and get access to all of it's fields without needing any unsafe code. Except the DST field which would if referenced just return a thin reference to the DST. For many thinks it would make writing unsafe code around all kinds of DST types much easier if we actually had thin pointers. For example we could have something like (scatch): #[repr(transparent)]
#[lang = "thin_ptr"] //see below
#[fundamental] //maybe?? I forgot what that did
pub struct Thin<T: ?Sized>(T) //EDIT: Didn't work out see below, it's now `ThinRef<'a,T>` (as well as `ThinMut`,`ThinConstPtr`, `ThinMutPtr`
//override auto-impl
unsafe impl<T> Pointee for Thin<T> {
type Metadata = ()
} The reason why it's a lang item is because it has a bit special deref handling, mainly:
This (or something similar) has some benefits:
By keeping the type instead of using Sure this doesn't really eliminate the data alignment fixing done in Still moving this tricky bits from user libraries to the core/std library seems to be a good idea I think and the improved type safety around Through we probably still would need to have a way to create a (Note that a There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. An additional problem I found is that you can't have unaligned references in rust. It's UB. So (Solved below) Another problem I found is that
But So either we return a "not so useful" value like alignment 1 and size of Like Which is slightly less elegant but would still work otherwise like described for This also would fix the inner alignment problem much easier as e.g. The only real problem would be if we point to not-allocated memory. But we are guaranteed to point to allocated memory. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
In today’s Rust a struct that contains a DST field is itself also a DST and therefore pointers to it are wide, not thin. Introducing thin pointers to DSTs (structs or not) is an entirely new language feature that is not part of this RFC. If you feel that feature should be pursued at the language level, consider writing a separate RFC for it. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This RFCs would enable a third-party library to implement a type like There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We have in the end 2 kinds of DSTs one which I refereed to as composed DST's which have any number of non DST fields and a tailing DST fields and what I will refer to as fundamental DSTs which are currently The problem is that without thin pointers to DSTs which allow access to non DST fields any library This makes it harder to implement all kind of custom DST types like e.g. slice with the length prefixing the slice or similar. Also semantically the While we seem to clearly disagree on this, thin pointers to DST are IMHO a fundamental part of the API around handling pointer metadata as they are the direct representation of fat-pointers without metadata. But then a new RFC could also try to amend any non yet stabilized RFC so I guess putting this into a separate RFC is worth a try. My goal is to long term make it possible to handle/write DST types without needing to know about all kinds of unsafe easy to get wrong without noticing it details like alignment fixing making custom DSTs available to any rust programmer. I will see if I can find time to write a RFC for this in the next week or so. |
||
|
||
/// Extract the metadata component of a pointer. | ||
/// | ||
/// Values of type `*mut T`, `&T`, or `&mut T` can be passed directly to this function | ||
/// as they implicitly coerce to `*const T`. | ||
/// For example: | ||
/// | ||
/// ``` | ||
/// assert_eq(std::ptr::metadata("foo"), 3_usize); | ||
/// ``` | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that the data component of a (fat) pointer can be extracted by casting | ||
/// to a (thin) pointer to any `Sized` type: | ||
/// | ||
/// ``` | ||
/// # trait SomeTrait {} | ||
/// # fn example(something: &SomeTrait) { | ||
/// let object: &SomeTrait = something; | ||
/// let data_ptr = object as *const SomeTrait as *const (); | ||
/// # } | ||
/// ``` | ||
pub fn metadata<T: ?Sized>(ptr: *const T) -> <T as Pointee>::Metadata {…} | ||
|
||
impl<T: ?Sized> *const T { | ||
pub fn from_raw_parts(data: *const (), meta: <T as Pointee>::Metadata) -> Self {…} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T { | ||
pub fn from_raw_parts(data: *mut (), meta: <T as Pointee>::Metadata) -> Self {…} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl<T: ?Sized> NonNull<T> { | ||
pub fn from_raw_parts(data: NonNull<()>, meta: <T as Pointee>::Metadata) -> Self { | ||
unsafe { | ||
NonNull::new_unchecked(<*mut _>::from_raw_parts(data.as_ptr(), meta)) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// The metadata for a `dyn SomeTrait` trait object type. | ||
/// | ||
/// It is a pointer to a vtable (virtual call table) | ||
/// that represents all the necessary information | ||
/// to manipulate the concrete type stored inside a trait object. | ||
/// The vtable notably it contains: | ||
/// | ||
/// * type size | ||
/// * type alignment | ||
/// * a pointer to the type’s `drop_in_place` impl (may be a no-op for plain-old-data) | ||
/// * pointers to all the methods for the type’s implementation of the trait | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that the first three are special because they’re necessary to allocate, drop, | ||
/// and deallocate any trait object. | ||
/// | ||
/// The layout of vtables is still unspecified, so this type is a more-type-safe | ||
/// convenience for accessing those 3 special values. Note however that `DynMetadata` does | ||
/// not actually know the trait it’s associated with, indicating that, at very least, | ||
/// the location of `size`, `align`, and `drop_in_place` is identical for all | ||
/// trait object vtables in a single program. | ||
#[derive(Copy, Clone)] | ||
pub struct DynMetadata { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One potential improvement I see with If we would keep the specific (This would mean But I'm not sure if this is worth the effort and added complexity. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This was discussed before (when DynMetadata still was VTable.) One of the major arguments against it was the potential increased compiler time. (Me guessing: Which given that this is a auto trait might be non neglibale?? Maybe?) I wonder if we have a way to erase the exact type of DynMetadata having just There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I’ve added an unresolved question. |
||
vtable_ptr: ptr::NonNull<()>, | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl DynMetadata { | ||
/// Returns the size of the type associated with this vtable. | ||
pub fn size(self) -> usize { ... } | ||
|
||
/// Returns the alignment of the type associated with this vtable. | ||
pub fn align(self) -> usize { ... } | ||
|
||
/// Returns the size and alignment together as a `Layout` | ||
pub fn layout(self) -> alloc::Layout { | ||
unsafe { | ||
alloc::Layout::from_size_align_unchecked(self.size(), self.align()) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. No drawbacks section...? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I came up short trying to think of a reason not to do this at all (as opposed to doing it differently). Suggestions welcome. |
||
|
||
# Rationale and alternatives | ||
[rationale-and-alternatives]: #rationale-and-alternatives | ||
|
||
The status quo is that code (such as linked in [Motivation]) that requires this functionality | ||
needs to transmute to and from `std::raw::TraitObject` | ||
or a copy of it (to be compatible with Stable Rust). | ||
Additionally, in cases where constructing the data pointer | ||
requires knowing the alignment of the concrete type, | ||
a dangling pointer such as `0x8000_0000_usize as *mut ()` needs to be created. | ||
It is not clear whether `std::mem::align_of(&*ptr)` with `ptr: *const dyn SomeTrait` | ||
is Undefined Behavior with a dangling data pointer. | ||
|
||
A [previous iteration][2579] of this RFC proposed a `DynTrait` | ||
that would only be implemented for trait objects like `dyn SomeTrait`. | ||
There would be no `Metadata` associated type, `DynMetadata` was hard-coded in the trait. | ||
In addition to being more general | ||
and (hopefully) more compatible with future custom DSTs proposals, | ||
this RFC resolves the question of what happens | ||
if trait objects with super-fat pointers with multiple vtable pointers are ever added. | ||
(Answer: they can use a different metadata type like `[DynMetadata; N]`.) | ||
|
||
`DynMetadata` could be made generic with a type parameter for the trait object type that it describes. | ||
This would avoid forcing that the size, alignment, and destruction pointers | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. How would that avoid forcing this? Can you elaborate? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Without a type parameter, |
||
be in the same location (offset) for every vtable. | ||
But keeping them in the same location is probaly desirable anyway to keep code size small. | ||
|
||
[2579]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2579 | ||
|
||
|
||
# Prior art | ||
[prior-art]: #prior-art | ||
|
||
A previous [Custom Dynamically-Sized Types][cdst] RFC was postponed. | ||
[Internals thread #6663][6663] took the same ideas | ||
and was even more ambitious in being very general. | ||
Except for `DynMetadata`’s methods, this RFC proposes a subset of what that thread did. | ||
|
||
[cdst]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1524 | ||
[6663]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-erfc-lets-fix-dsts/6663 | ||
|
||
|
||
# Unresolved questions | ||
[unresolved-questions]: #unresolved-questions | ||
|
||
* The name of `Pointee`. [Internals thread #6663][6663] used `Referent`. | ||
|
||
* The location of `DynMetadata`. Is another module more appropriate than `std::ptr`? | ||
|
||
* Should `DynMetadata` have a type parameter for what trait object type it is a metadata of? | ||
Such that `<dyn SomeTrait as Pointee>::Metadata` is `DynMetadata<dyn SomTrait>`. | ||
This would allow the memory layout to change based on the trait object type | ||
(potentially super-wide pointers with multiple vtable pointers for multi-trait objects?) | ||
or to have different methods. | ||
|
||
* The name of `Thin`. | ||
This name is short and sweet but `T: Thin` suggests that `T` itself is thin, | ||
rather than pointers and references to `T`. | ||
|
||
* The location of `Thin`. Better in `std::marker`? | ||
|
||
* Should `Thin` be added as a supertrait of `Sized`? | ||
Or could it ever make sense to have fat pointers to statically-sized types? | ||
|
||
* Are there other generic standard library APIs like `ptr::null()` | ||
that have an (implicit) `T: Sized` bound that unneccesarily excludes extern types? | ||
|
||
* Should `<*mut _>::from_raw_parts` and friends be `unsafe fn`s? | ||
|
||
* API design: free functions v.s. methods/constructors on `*mut _` and `*const _`? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.