-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
Updates 2.0.4 #203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates 2.0.4 #203
Conversation
Correct EPC behaviour - Issue-210
Clarified sequentially inferrable jumps - Issue-211
Removed obsolete text - Issue-221
Updates 2.0.4 issue 225
Emphasized the need to implement the predicted branch count in full -…
Fixed cross-ref typo - Issue 228
Add timing mitigation for implicit return and JTC - issue 206
exampleAlgorithm.adoc
Outdated
outputting a format 3 packet, it is necessary to output a format 0/1 | ||
packet for the preceding instruction if there are any unreported | ||
branches (because format 3 does not contain a branch map). The format 3 | ||
branches (because format 3 does not contain a branch map). There are several supported options for incrementing the resync timer (packets, cycle or instruction half-words), and as such updates to the timer do not necessarily coincide with instrucitn retirements. A small, independent FSM can be used to ensure the required packets are output in the required order, as follows: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"instrucitn" is a typo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks - fixed.
Generalised CSRs for traps - Issue 232
Signed-off-by: Martin <64287006+MartinAment@users.noreply.github.com>
Update ingressPort.adoc: add missing word
@ved-rivos Reworked change history into new preface format. If you're happy with this I just need to update the publication date date and merge to main |
@IainCRobertson looks good to me |
Ved, this is the consolidated development branch addressing all the recent E-Trace requests for clarification and corrections. Each of these was individually reviewed and approved by yourself, and have now been merged into this branch.
Given that all changes are informative only, do we need any additional approvals before merging this to main?