User Testing Reports

User Testing Results

These tests were conducted in sprint 4 (Please find User Testing Script and Result documentation in user_testing/results directory)

Task & Question	Tester 1	Tester 2	Tester 3	Tester 4	Tester 5
Task 1: Onboarding Process	Found “Games” section after initial confusion; clear once seen.	Could be more interactive.	Used phone; not specified.	Clear enough to understand the game process.	Straightforward, nice overview.
Task 2: Visual Style & Engagement	Likes different levels/themes; progressively harder.	Fullscreen stretches image; game is fun.	Pretty nice; works well.	Friendly UI; straightforward rules.	Nice visuals; could be better with multiple objects.
Task 3: Transition Between Levels	Smooth transition; intuitive controls.	Made sense; zoom controls not obvious.	Inconvenient navigation; game over screen not phone compatible.	Smooth; clear indicators of goal achievement.	Easy transition; suggests showing target object image.
Task 4: Full-Screen Mode & Zoom	Intuitive controls; full-screen appreciated.	Full-screen button confusion.	Loses lives in full-screen on phone.	Easy navigation; zoom enhances experience.	Easy-to-use full-screen button; suggests hint for zoom.
Task 5: Finding Developer Info	“About Us” button was helpful.	Not specified.	Not difficult to find.	Depends on game popularity and developer openness.	Easy to use “About Us” link; can access developer LinkedIn.
Task 6: Website Navigation	Prefers clicking logo for home; simple game but engaging.	Navigation is nice; some levels difficult at first.	Easy; logo should return to homepage.	Simple and intuitive; medium difficulty to locate game.	Consistent navigation bar; easy to access different webpages.
Task 7: Overall Impressions	Would recommend; likes the game concept.	Might play again; 4/5 stars.	It’s fine; would not play but recognizes potential.	Positive; likely to recommend.	Likely to play again; rates 8.8/10.