AI glossary first submission

[kelbrown20]

This PR adds new AI terms to the style guide glossary

[bergerhoffer]

Here's a first pass at a few bits of feedback!

[bergerhoffer]

This should move above "inference serving" and "InferenceService" to be alphabetical

[bergerhoffer]

We don't use markup in the headings. Just in the description below. Though to be honest, I don't think we've historically really put object names in as glossary entries. Is this always written this way, or would it sometimes be written generically as the "inference service"?

If yes, then I would put "inference service" as the glossary entry, and then say something in the description like, if you're talking about the actual object, then write it as InferenceService.

For a glossary entry in a similar situation, see "pod", "persistent volume claim", "service", etc.

Suggested change

	==== image:images/yes.png[yes] `InferenceService` (noun)
	==== image:images/yes.png[yes] InferenceService (noun)

[bergerhoffer]

Was this incorrect form supposed to be "inference service"?

(Also going back to my question about whether "inference service" could ever been used generically. It's fine if it's how you want to do it, but I also express my concerns about references to a certain concept always having to be in pascal case/monospace, since that's not a great reader experience)

Suggested change

	*Incorrect forms*: InferenceService, inference serving, inferenceservice
	*Incorrect forms*: InferenceService, inference serving, inference service

[kelbrown20]

I don't think we want to suggest 'inference service' on its own. I only see it in the context of the object, but ill ask the RHOAI folks as well.