Add const-generic IndexedParallelIterator::arrays
#974
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cuviper
commented
Aug 31, 2022
src/iter/mod.rs
Outdated
| /// the remaining items are ignored. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// See also [`par_array_chunks()`] and [`par_array_chunks_mut()`] for similar | ||
| /// behavior on slices, although they yield array references instead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This reference depends on #789.
|
I missed that the standard library now has an unstable |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
arrays<N>()works likechunks(N)without remainder, and yielding[Item; N]rather than allocatedVec<Item>.There's no sequential precedent for this yet, but it's proposed in itertools#549. It may also be useful in places that would want
Itertools::tuples(#971), because arrays are a first-class alternative to homogeneous tuples.