-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
update: CODEOWNERS
#1725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update: CODEOWNERS
#1725
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes involve the modification of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
.github/CODEOWNERS
Outdated
|
|
||
| # Primary repo maintainers | ||
| * @joe-bowman @faddat @minhngoc274 @tropicaldog | ||
| * @joe-bowman @faddat @minhngoc274 @tropicaldog @ajansari95 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found During Verification
-
Maintainer Verification Failed: Unable to confirm that
@ajansari95is a member of thequicksilver-zoneorganization. Please ensure that the new maintainer is correctly added to the organization. -
Incomplete PR Description: The PR description still contains a placeholder (
Fixes # (issue)). Please update it with the specific issue being addressed to provide necessary context for this change.
Please address these issues before the PR can be approved.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved change, but additional context and verification needed.
The addition of @ajansari95 as a primary repo maintainer is correctly implemented. However, given the significance of this change, please address the following points:
- Verify that @ajansari95 should indeed have maintainer access to the entire repository.
- Update the PR description with the context for this addition, including the specific issue it addresses (currently referenced as a placeholder).
- Consider reviewing your GitHub team structure to ensure that granting repository-wide access aligns with your project's governance model.
To ensure this change is intentional and properly documented, please run the following script:
This script will help verify the new maintainer's association with the organization and remind you to update the PR description with proper context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new maintainer and PR description
# Check if the new maintainer is part of the organization
gh api graphql -f query='
query($org: String!, $username: String!) {
organization(login: $org) {
membersWithRole(query: $username) {
nodes {
login
}
}
}
}
' -f org='quicksilver-zone' -f username='ajansari95'
# Check if the PR description has been updated with context
pr_body=$(gh pr view 1725 --json body -q .body)
if [[ $pr_body == *"Fixes #"* ]]; then
echo "PR description still contains placeholder issue reference. Please update with actual context."
else
echo "PR description has been updated. Please ensure it provides sufficient context for this change."
fi
Length of output: 3559
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1725 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 63.41% 63.41%
=======================================
Files 194 194
Lines 13436 13436
=======================================
Hits 8521 8521
Misses 4097 4097
Partials 818 818
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
joe-bowman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
1. Summary
Fixes # (issue)
2.Type of change
3. Implementation details
4. How to test/use
5. Checklist
6. Limitations (optional)
7. Future Work (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
@minhngoc274to@ajansari95.