Skip to content

Fix for WPSS Remoteproc test #59

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

vnarapar
Copy link
Contributor

This commit will fix the wpss remoteproc test issue.

Added the proper framework support in the test script

This commit will fix the wpss remoteproc test issue.

Added the proper framework support in the test script

Signed-off-by: Vamsee Narapareddi <vnarapar@qti.qualcomm.com>
@vnarapar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vnarapar vnarapar requested a review from smuppand May 30, 2025 20:44
@@ -38,7 +64,7 @@ echo stop > ${remoteproc_path}/state
state3=$(cat ${remoteproc_path}/state)
if [ "$state3" != "offline" ]; then
log_fail "wpss stop failed"
echo "$TESTNAME FAIL" > $test_path/$TESTNAME.res
echo "$TESTNAME FAIL" > "$res_file"
exit 1
else
log_pass "wpss stop successful"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we also fix

and L86 to use $TESTNAME

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated line 86 and 86

Copy link
Contributor

@smuppand smuppand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rebase your feature branch on top of the latest main.

@vnarapar
Copy link
Contributor Author

vnarapar commented Jun 3, 2025

Will be addressed as part of #64. Closing this PR

@vnarapar vnarapar closed this Jun 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants