Skip to content

Conversation

@woodruffw
Copy link
Contributor

@woodruffw woodruffw commented May 21, 2025

Pre-PEP thread: https://discuss.python.org/t/pre-pep-discussion-project-status-markers-in-the-index-apis/79356

Once allocated a number, I'll make the official PEP thread and update here!

Basic requirements (all PEP Types)

  • Read and followed PEP 1 & PEP 12
  • File created from the latest PEP template
  • PEP has next available number, & set in filename (pep-NNNN.rst), PR title (PEP 123: <Title of PEP>) and PEP header
  • Title clearly, accurately and concisely describes the content in 79 characters or less
  • Core dev/PEP editor listed as Author or Sponsor, and formally confirmed their approval
  • Author, Status (Draft), Type and Created headers filled out correctly
  • PEP-Delegate, Topic, Requires and Replaces headers completed if appropriate
  • Required sections included
    • Abstract (first section)
    • Copyright (last section; exact wording from template required)
  • Code is well-formatted (PEP 7/PEP 8) and is in code blocks, with the right lexer names if non-Python
  • PEP builds with no warnings, pre-commit checks pass and content displays as intended in the rendered HTML
  • Authors/sponsor added to .github/CODEOWNERS for the PEP

Standards Track requirements

  • PEP topic discussed in a suitable venue with general agreement that a PEP is appropriate
  • Suggested sections included (unless not applicable)
    • Motivation
    • Rationale
    • Specification
    • Backwards Compatibility
    • Security Implications
    • How to Teach This
    • Reference Implementation
    • Rejected Ideas
    • Open Issues
  • Python-Version set to valid (pre-beta) future Python version, if relevant
  • Any project stated in the PEP as supporting/endorsing/benefiting from the PEP formally confirmed such
  • Right before or after initial merging, PEP discussion thread created and linked to in Discussions-To and Post-History

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4432.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0792/

Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
@woodruffw woodruffw requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2025 21:49
@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title PEP: Project status markers in the simple index PEP 792: Project status markers in the simple index May 21, 2025
@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

AA-Turner commented May 21, 2025

PEP 792 is yours. Please wait until this PR is merged & the proper link is online until creating the new Discourse topic.

A

@AA-Turner AA-Turner added the new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review label May 21, 2025
woodruffw and others added 3 commits May 21, 2025 18:26
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
woodruffw and others added 2 commits May 21, 2025 22:22
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
woodruffw and others added 6 commits May 22, 2025 09:46
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <william@yossarian.net>
@woodruffw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gentle ping for merge 🙂 -- I'll make the thread once in!

@AA-Turner AA-Turner merged commit 185eacf into python:main Jun 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the project-status-markers branch June 9, 2025 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-pep A new draft PEP submitted for initial review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants