Skip to content

PEP 770: Add canonical specification #4418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

sethmlarson
Copy link
Contributor

@sethmlarson sethmlarson commented May 8, 2025

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

Links to the canonical specification for PEP 770.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4418.org.readthedocs.build/

@sethmlarson sethmlarson requested a review from brettcannon as a code owner May 8, 2025 19:13
@sethmlarson sethmlarson requested a review from AA-Turner May 8, 2025 19:45
@brettcannon brettcannon merged commit 61cfcda into python:main May 12, 2025
5 checks passed
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ Post-History:
`06-Jan-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/76308>`__,
Resolution: `11-Apr-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/76308/112>`__

.. canonical-pypa-spec:: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/binary-distribution-format/#the-dist-info-sboms-directory
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner May 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is worse than the original proposal in the PR, we're now tied to the specific URL rather than the automatic cross-reference

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can update later once @sethmlarson has gotten a :ref: at packaging.python.org that can be used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants