Skip to content

[3.14] GH-135171: Revert async generator expressions behavior #135352

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 3.14
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions Lib/test/test_asyncgen.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1835,6 +1835,13 @@ async def run():
res = self.loop.run_until_complete(run())
self.assertEqual(res, [i * 2 for i in range(1, 10)])

def test_async_gen_expression_incorrect(self):
err_msg_async = "'async for' requires an object with " \
"__aiter__ method, got .*"

with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, err_msg_async):
(x async for x in None)

def test_asyncgen_nonstarted_hooks_are_cancellable(self):
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue38013
messages = []
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Reverts the behavior of async generator expressions when created with object
w/o __aiter__ method to the pre-3.13 behavior of raising a TypeError.
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions Python/codegen.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4544,9 +4544,9 @@ codegen_async_comprehension_generator(compiler *c, location loc,
else {
/* Sub-iter - calculate on the fly */
VISIT(c, expr, gen->iter);
ADDOP(c, LOC(gen->iter), GET_AITER);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, is this change necessary? I think the test passes without it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so. There was a bug in previous commit. I've reverted related logic in codegen.c.

}
}
ADDOP(c, LOC(gen->iter), GET_AITER);

USE_LABEL(c, start);
/* Runtime will push a block here, so we need to account for that */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4776,7 +4776,6 @@ codegen_comprehension(compiler *c, expr_ty e, int type,
location loc = LOC(e);

outermost = (comprehension_ty) asdl_seq_GET(generators, 0);
int is_sync_genexpr = type == COMP_GENEXP && !outermost->is_async;
if (is_inlined) {
VISIT(c, expr, outermost->iter);
if (push_inlined_comprehension_state(c, loc, entry, &inline_state)) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4853,8 +4852,13 @@ codegen_comprehension(compiler *c, expr_ty e, int type,
Py_CLEAR(co);

VISIT(c, expr, outermost->iter);
if (is_sync_genexpr) {
ADDOP(c, loc, GET_ITER);
if (type == COMP_GENEXP) {
if (outermost->is_async) {
ADDOP(c, loc, GET_AITER);
}
else {
ADDOP(c, loc, GET_ITER);
}
}
ADDOP_I(c, loc, CALL, 0);

Expand Down
Loading