Skip to content

Fix s390x dynamic loader symlink #672

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hjiawei
Copy link
Collaborator

@hjiawei hjiawei commented Apr 11, 2025

This change resolves an issue with the s390x dynamic loader symlink. On s390x UBI 8, the symlink points to /usr/lib64. This directory is not included in the Calico base image, resulting a dangling symlink and preventing programs from loading. This update corrects the symlink and added a test to validate the minimum C runtime. It also fixes semvalidator multi-arch builds.

This change resolves an issue with the s390x dynamic loader symlink.
On s390x UBI 8, the symlink points to `/usr/lib64`. This directory
is not included in the Calico base image, resulting a dangling symlink
and preventing programs from loading. This update corrects the
symlink and added a test to validate the minimum C runtime. It also
fixes semvalidator multi-arch builds.
@hjiawei hjiawei merged commit 9f47c49 into projectcalico:master Apr 11, 2025
3 checks passed
@hjiawei hjiawei deleted the fix-ld-s390x branch April 11, 2025 18:48
hjiawei added a commit to hjiawei/calico that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
This change updates calico/base image for s390x to fix a dangling
symlink issue that prevents programs from loading. See changes
in [1].

[1] projectcalico/go-build#672
hjiawei added a commit to hjiawei/calico that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
This change updates calico/base image for s390x to fix a dangling
symlink issue that prevents programs from loading. See changes
in [1].

[1] projectcalico/go-build#672
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants