Skip to content

Add GPML logical plan and plan -> evaluator. #549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025
Merged

Add GPML logical plan and plan -> evaluator. #549

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2025

Conversation

jpschorr
Copy link
Contributor

@jpschorr jpschorr commented Mar 21, 2025

This PR:


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 73.20955% with 101 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.56%. Comparing base (eb01344) to head (f595ebc).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
partiql-eval/src/plan.rs 0.00% 94 Missing ⚠️
partiql-types/src/lib.rs 44.44% 5 Missing ⚠️
partiql-eval/src/eval/expr/graph_match.rs 99.63% 1 Missing ⚠️
partiql-value/src/datum.rs 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (73.20%) is below the target coverage (85.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #549      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.91%   81.56%   -0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         106      107       +1     
  Lines       22386    22487     +101     
  Branches    22386    22487     +101     
==========================================
+ Hits        18337    18342       +5     
- Misses       3536     3632      +96     
  Partials      513      513              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Conformance comparison report

Base (eb01344) 7e10b77 +/-
% Passing 87.15% 87.15% 0.00%
✅ Passing 5603 5603 0
❌ Failing 826 826 0
🔶 Ignored 0 0 0
Total Tests 6429 6429 0

Number passing in both: 5603

Number failing in both: 826

Number passing in Base (eb01344) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (eb01344) but now pass: 0

@jpschorr jpschorr marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 20:48
@jpschorr jpschorr requested review from alancai98 and am357 March 21, 2025 20:48
Base automatically changed from feat-parse-gpml to main March 21, 2025 21:34
Copy link
Member

@alancai98 alancai98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. One comment about if what's moved from partiql-eval/src/lib.rs is the same as what's now in partiql-eval/src/eval/expr/graph_match.rs.

@@ -2435,301 +2435,4 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(Value::Bag(Box::new(expected)), res);
}
}

mod graph {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume this is basically the same as what's now in partiql-eval/src/eval/expr/graph_match.rs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

@jpschorr jpschorr merged commit a6d8e0f into main Mar 26, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants