This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
ext fees inclusion on tip #14717
Closed
ext fees inclusion on tip #14717
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes paritytech/polkadot-sdk#257
In the quest of getting a clear picture of the problem,
I have included the final_scaled_tip for normal txn to include their inclusion fees. But I have a question on regarding the normal txn will be competing with operational txn and I think we have to make sure the normal txn scaled_tip wont be greater than operational txn scaled tip
Also concerning Gav issue on standard scale txn priority paritytech/polkadot-sdk#277 , I think we should change the how we operate on txn priority and maybe have a trait so that substrate chains can define how they want the priority to be and provide maybe a default implementation.