Skip to content

docs(user-head): [user-head] fix type definition format to ensure type description consistency #3482

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2025

Conversation

zzcr
Copy link
Member

@zzcr zzcr commented Jun 5, 2025

docs(user-head): 修复头像组件e2e报错问题

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Improved formatting of type annotations and property descriptions in the component API documentation for better readability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The update adjusts the type annotation for the modelValue property to a quoted string and reformats the English description strings for modelValue and value into multi-line string literals within the component API metadata. No logic or control flow is changed.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/apis/user-head.js Quoted the type annotation for modelValue; reformatted English descriptions to multi-line literals.

Poem

A rabbit hops with careful might,
Quoting types to get them right.
Descriptions now in lines so neat,
The API docs are quite a treat.
With every tweak and tidy string,
The codebase makes my whiskers sing!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

examples/sites/demos/apis/user-head.js

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-vue".

(The package "eslint-plugin-vue" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".)

It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following:

npm install eslint-plugin-vue@latest --save-dev

The plugin "eslint-plugin-vue" was referenced from the config file in ".eslintrc.js » @antfu/eslint-config » @antfu/eslint-config-vue".

If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21dfc72 and b01ca2a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/sites/demos/apis/user-head.js (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: PR Unit Test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/sites/demos/apis/user-head.js (3)

82-82: LGTM! Type annotation formatting corrected for consistency.

The change from Component | 'string' to 'Component | string' properly quotes the entire type definition, maintaining consistency with other type definitions in the file that are all string literals.


86-87: LGTM! Multi-line formatting improves readability.

The reformatting of the English description from a single-line string to a multi-line string literal enhances readability without changing the content.


134-135: LGTM! Consistent formatting applied to value property.

The description formatting matches the change made to the modelValue property, ensuring consistency across similar properties in the API definition.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@zzcr zzcr changed the title docs(user-head): fix type definition format to ensure type description consistency docs(user-head): [user-head] fix type definition format to ensure type description consistency Jun 5, 2025
@zzcr zzcr merged commit cc1e49e into dev Jun 5, 2025
17 of 21 checks passed
@zzcr zzcr deleted the fix-user-header-error branch June 5, 2025 02:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant