Skip to content

OSDOCS-15521: Fix discrete headings #96685

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor

@abrennan89 abrennan89 commented Jul 24, 2025

Version(s):
4.14+ (TBC) @bergerhoffer

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15521

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A structural changes only

Additional information:

For some of the modules, I had to split them into additional modules to avoid level 3 and 4 headings. This is a quick fix; I have not done a thorough review and edit of the content, just splitting the modules. These sections should be revisited by the relevant writers and updated as required.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-15521 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
I think the idea is to CP these fixes as far back as we can go? @bergerhoffer

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15521

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A structural changes only

Additional information:

For some of the modules, I had to split them into additional modules to avoid level 3 and 4 headings. This is a quick fix; I have not done a thorough review and edit of the content, just splitting the modules. These sections should be revisited by the relevant writers and updated as required.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 24, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 24, 2025
@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

I think the idea is to CP these fixes as far back as we can go? @bergerhoffer

Good question. I actually just opened a jira to try to finalize which versions we should be targeting for these migration efforts: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15537

I'm proposing stopping at 4.14, based on EOL dates. But still waiting to hear on that.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Thu Jul 24 20:55:20 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://96685--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 24, 2025

@abrennan89: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-15521 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
I think the idea is to CP these fixes as far back as we can go? @bergerhoffer

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15521

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A structural changes only

Additional information:

For some of the modules, I had to split them into additional modules to avoid level 3 and 4 headings. This is a quick fix; I have not done a thorough review and edit of the content, just splitting the modules. These sections should be revisited by the relevant writers and updated as required.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references OSDOCS-15521 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.14+ (TBC) @bergerhoffer

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15521

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A structural changes only

Additional information:

For some of the modules, I had to split them into additional modules to avoid level 3 and 4 headings. This is a quick fix; I have not done a thorough review and edit of the content, just splitting the modules. These sections should be revisited by the relevant writers and updated as required.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@michaelryanpeter
Copy link
Contributor

OLM content, LGTM

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

Node tasks LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants