Skip to content

Update nw-ingress-configuring-application-domain.adoc #96043

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor

@prithvipatil97 prithvipatil97 commented Jul 11, 2025

Expose the route:

$ oc expose service hello-openshift
route.route.openshift.io/hello-openshift exposed 
  • The above command is not structured properly.
  • We can use the above command as well, and it will execute perfectly.
  • But its structure is not as per our standard procedure.
  • Hence, it needs to be changed.

Here is the updated look:
Expose the route:

$ oc expose service hello-openshift
  route.route.openshift.io/hello-openshift exposed

Version(s):

RHOCP 4.20, RHOCP 4.19, RHOCP 4.18, RHOCP 4.17, RHOCP 4.16

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15294

Link to docs preview:

https://96043--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/networking/networking_operators/ingress-operator.html
https://96043--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/networking/networking_operators/ingress-operator.html
https://96043--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/networking/networking_operators/ingress-operator.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Wrong structure of command needs to be corrected
Here is the documentation link:
https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.16/html/networking/networking-operators#nw-ingress-configuring-application-domain_configuring-ingress 
Here is the current look:

Expose the route:

$ oc expose service hello-openshift
route.route.openshift.io/hello-openshift exposed 
The above command is not structured properly.
We can use the above command as well, and it will execute perfectly.
But its structure is not as per our standard procedure.
Hence, it needs to be changed.
Here is the updated look:
Expose the route:

$ oc expose service hello-openshift
  route.route.openshift.io/hello-openshift exposed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 11, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@prithvipatil97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants