Skip to content

OSDOCS-15162 [NETOBSERV] Rename file that is concept module #96033

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Jul 11, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15162 [NETOBSERV] Rename file that is concept module

Version(s):
4.12, 4.14+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15162

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
QE review is not required for this PR.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 11, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 11, 2025

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 14, 2025
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. I usually do a check to make sure it isn't called anywhere else (like do a search in VS code) to make sure there's no issue if it's removed, or make sure to put in a redirect request so that it doesn't break a link if it's renamed.

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jul 15, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased AM 07/15/2025

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants