Skip to content

Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-proced… #95410

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2025

Conversation

prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor

@prithvipatil97 prithvipatil97 commented Jun 28, 2025

Following changes are required:

  1. Need to add $ sign at the start of each command.
  2. Need to mention underscore between
  3. Need to add <node_name> value for 1

Version(s):

RHOCP 4.20, RHOCP 4.19, RHOCP 4.18, RHOCP 4.17, RHOCP 4.16, RHOCP 4.15, RHOCP 4.14, RHOCP 4.13

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-2047

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

https://95410--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/storage/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown.html

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 28, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jun 28, 2025

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 28, 2025
@aspauldi
Copy link

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jun 30, 2025
@aspauldi
Copy link

aspauldi commented Jun 30, 2025

Hi, I added a suggestion for rewording the callout text, hoping to make it less awkward. (I realize though that your update was just to use the underscore, so consider the rewrite but I understand if you prefer not to make the changes.)

Overall LGTM!

@aspauldi
Copy link

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 30, 2025
@eohartman
Copy link
Contributor

Make sure to add the link to the preview in your description. Thank you!

…ure.adoc

- Incorrect structure in the OpenShift documentation
- Here is the documentation link:
https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/openshift_container_platform/4.16/html/storage/ephemeral-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown#persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure_ephemeral-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown

-$ sign is missing from every command.
- <node name> is mentioned without an underscore.

Following changes are required:

1. Need to add $ sign at the start of each command.
2. Need to mention underscore between <node name>
3. Need to add <node_name> value for 1

Newcommit-Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc

Newcommit-Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@prithvipatil97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @eohartman ,
Thanks for the peer review and suggestions.
I have successfully committed the suggested changes.
Now, I will ask for QE approval.

Regards,
Prithviraj Patil

@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello Team,
I need QE approval for this change.

All checks have passed, and Peer review is also done.

It would be really helpful if someone could please take a look and provide QE approval for this change.

cc: @Phaow @duanwei33, @ropatil010

Regards,
Prithviraj Patil

@ropatil010
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 9, 2025
@prithvipatil97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 9, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit bebce35 into openshift:main Jul 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: #95410 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.13":

Applying: Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13
/cherrypick enterprise-4.14
/cherrypick enterprise-4.15
/cherrypick enterprise-4.16
/cherrypick enterprise-4.17
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: #95410 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.14":

Applying: Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Update persistent-storage-csi-vol-detach-non-graceful-shutdown-procedure.adoc

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95851

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95852

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95853

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95854

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95855

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mburke5678: new pull request created: #95856

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.13 branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 branch/enterprise-4.20 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants